S v Ansell (318/90) [1991] ZASCA 132 (27 September 1991)

S v Ansell (318/90) [1991] ZASCA 132 (27 September 1991)

The court held that the magistrate and the court a quo correctly applied the cautionary rules to the evidence of the complainant, a single child witness in a sexual offence case. The complainant's evidence was found to be satisfactory and not blemished by any apparent motive for false accusation. The appellant's version was rejected as improbable, and no factual basis existed for any alternative motive. The court concluded that the conviction for crimen injuria was justified on the evidence presented.

Citation
[1991] ZASCA 132
Parties
Appellant: Anthony Howard Ansell; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
27 September 1991
Case Number
318/90
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Judges
Nestadt, F.H. Grosskopf, Harms
Legal Topics
Crimen Injuria, Single Witness Evidence, Cautionary Rule, Sexual Offences, Motive for False Accusation
Criminal Law Crimen Injuria Single Witness Evidence Cautionary Rule Sexual Offences Motive for False Accusation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Howard Ansell

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction of the appellant for crimen injuria was justified on the evidence of a single witness.
  2. 2 Whether the cautionary rules applicable to evidence of children and complainants in sexual matters were properly applied.
  3. 3 Whether the complainant had any motive to falsely implicate the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the magistrate and the court a quo correctly applied the cautionary rules to the evidence of the complainant, a single child witness in a sexual offence case. The complainant's evidence was found to be satisfactory and not blemished by any apparent motive for false accusation. The appellant's version was rejected as improbable, and no factual basis existed for any alternative motive. The court concluded that the conviction for crimen injuria was justified on the evidence presented.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.