S v Blackie [2003] ZAFSHC 8 (27 March 2003)

S v Blackie [2003] ZAFSHC 8 (27 March 2003)

The court found that the complainant's evidence was unreliable due to her age, vague and inconsistent responses, and susceptibility to suggestion. The expert psychologist's testimony was inadmissible to bolster credibility, as the assessment of witness reliability is the exclusive function of the court. Corroborative reports made by the complainant to others were improperly relied upon, as only the first report is admissible in sexual offence cases. The medical evidence did not conclusively support the complainant's account. The possibility of suggestion influencing the complainant's testimony was not excluded. Consequently, the State failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and...

Citation
[2003] ZAFSHC 8
Parties
Appellant: Pieter Willem Blackie; Respondent: The State
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
27 March 2003
Case Number
4608/2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal upheld. Convictions and sentences set aside.
Judges
Schoeman R, Ebrahim R
Legal Topics
Child Witness Evidence, Sexual Offences, Cautionary Rule, Expert Evidence Admissibility
Criminal Law Child Witness Evidence Sexual Offences Cautionary Rule Expert Evidence Admissibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pieter Willem Blackie

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the evidence of the child complainant was sufficiently reliable to sustain convictions for rape and indecent assault.
  2. 2 Whether expert psychological evidence was admissible to bolster the credibility of the child witness.
  3. 3 Whether corroborative statements and reports made by the complainant to others were properly admitted and relied upon.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the complainant's evidence was unreliable due to her age, vague and inconsistent responses, and susceptibility to suggestion. The expert psychologist's testimony was inadmissible to bolster credibility, as the assessment of witness reliability is the exclusive function of the court. Corroborative reports made by the complainant to others were improperly relied upon, as only the first report is admissible in sexual offence cases. The medical evidence did not conclusively support the complainant's account. The possibility of suggestion influencing the complainant's testimony was not excluded. Consequently, the State failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld. Convictions and sentences set aside.

Orders

  • The convictions and sentences imposed by the trial court are set aside.