S v Booi (175/2014) [2014] ZAFSHC 164 (9 October 2014)
The order made by the trial magistrate for the State to reimburse the accused's travelling expenses was invalid because section 342A(3)(e) of Act 51 of 1977 had not yet been put into operation. The review court, therefore, set aside the order as it was made without legal authority.
- Citation
- [2014] ZAFSHC 164
- Parties
- Applicant: The State; Respondent: Mbongeni Booi
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 October 2014
- Case Number
- 175/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Special Review Under Section 304(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act
- Outcome
- Order of reimbursement set aside.
- Judges
- A.F. Jordaan, M.H. Rampai
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Procedure Act Section 304, Invalid Magistrate Order, Reimbursement of Expenses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Applicant
Mbongeni Booi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Special Review Under Section 304(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrate's order for reimbursement of the accused's travelling expenses under section 342A(3)(e) of Act 51 of 1977 was valid.
- 2 Whether section 342A(3)(e) of Act 51 of 1977 was operational at the time of the order.
Ratio Decidendi
The order made by the trial magistrate for the State to reimburse the accused's travelling expenses was invalid because section 342A(3)(e) of Act 51 of 1977 had not yet been put into operation. The review court, therefore, set aside the order as it was made without legal authority.
Court Disposition
Order of reimbursement set aside.
Orders
- The order made by the trial court in terms of section 342A(3)(e) of Act 51 of 1977 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment