S v Borotho (336/2012) [2012] ZAFSHC 243 (20 December 2012)

S v Borotho (336/2012) [2012] ZAFSHC 243 (20 December 2012)

The court found that the evidence did not establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had the intention to cause grievous bodily harm. The injuries sustained by the complainant were not shown to be serious, no dangerous weapon was used, and the accused's version of self-defence was reasonably possible. The absence of corroborating witnesses and the failure to assist the accused in presenting his defence further undermined the State's case. Consequently, the conviction and sentence were not in accordance with justice and had to be set aside.

Citation
[2012] ZAFSHC 243
Parties
Applicant: The State; Respondent: Thekiso Vincent Borotho
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 December 2012
Case Number
336/2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review / Automatic Review Under Section 302 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Outcome
Conviction and sentence set aside.
Judges
Rampai, Van Zyl
Legal Topics
Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm, Self Defence, Onus of Proof, Competent Verdict, Cautionary Rule
Criminal Law Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm Self Defence Onus of Proof Competent Verdict Cautionary Rule

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Thekiso Vincent Borotho

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Review / Automatic Review Under Section 302 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused assaulted the complainant with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
  2. 2 Whether the accused acted in self-defence.
  3. 3 Whether the conviction and sentence were in accordance with justice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the evidence did not establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had the intention to cause grievous bodily harm. The injuries sustained by the complainant were not shown to be serious, no dangerous weapon was used, and the accused's version of self-defence was reasonably possible. The absence of corroborating witnesses and the failure to assist the accused in presenting his defence further undermined the State's case. Consequently, the conviction and sentence were not in accordance with justice and had to be set aside.

Court Disposition

Conviction and sentence set aside.

Orders

  • The conviction and sentence of the accused under Kroonstad case number A1152/12 are set aside.