S v Buisang (547/2005) [2005] ZAGPHC 359 (8 June 2005)

S v Buisang (547/2005) [2005] ZAGPHC 359 (8 June 2005)

The magistrate imposed a fine of R2000, which exceeded the statutory maximum of R1500 under section 112(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The High Court, exercising its review powers, confirmed the conviction but set aside the sentence and substituted it with a lawful sentence of a fine of R1500 or three months’ imprisonment, wholly suspended for three years on condition that the accused is not convicted of any crime involving violence during the suspension period.

Citation
[2005] ZAGPHC 359
Parties
Applicant: The State; Respondent: Johannes Buisang
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
8 June 2005
Case Number
547/2005
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Special Review Under Section 304(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act
Outcome
Conviction confirmed; sentence set aside and substituted with a lawful sentence.
Judges
N.P. Willis, C.P. Rabie
Legal Topics
Criminal Sentencing, Review Proceedings, Assault, Firearms Control
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Criminal Sentencing Review Proceedings Assault Firearms Control

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Johannes Buisang

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Special Review Under Section 304(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed exceeded the statutory maximum under section 112(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
  2. 2 Whether the conviction should be confirmed despite the sentencing error.
  3. 3 Whether the substituted sentence complies with statutory requirements.

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrate imposed a fine of R2000, which exceeded the statutory maximum of R1500 under section 112(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The High Court, exercising its review powers, confirmed the conviction but set aside the sentence and substituted it with a lawful sentence of a fine of R1500 or three months’ imprisonment, wholly suspended for three years on condition that the accused is not convicted of any crime involving violence during the suspension period.

Court Disposition

Conviction confirmed; sentence set aside and substituted with a lawful sentence.

Orders

  • The conviction of the accused is confirmed.
  • The sentence imposed by the magistrate on 26 April 2005 is reviewed and set aside.