S v Cloete (140/91) [1993] ZASCA 10 (2 March 1993)

S v Cloete (140/91) [1993] ZASCA 10 (2 March 1993)

The court found that the appellant's version of acting in a state of automatism was not credible. The evidence, including his conduct before and after the shootings, the content of his letters and phone calls, and his statements to witnesses, demonstrated that he acted consciously and purposefully. The expert psychiatric evidence from Dr Vorster supported the conclusion that the appellant was able to appreciate the wrongfulness of his actions and act accordingly. The trial court was justified in rejecting the appellant's version and convicting him of murder. The appeal against conviction was dismissed as the findings of guilt were fully supported by the evidence.

Citation
[1993] ZASCA 10
Parties
Appellant: Arie Willem Cloete; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
2 March 1993
Case Number
140/91
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Judges
C T Howie, Hoexter, Van Heerden
Legal Topics
Murder, Criminal Capacity, Automatism, Intent, Psychiatric Evidence
Criminal Law Murder Criminal Capacity Automatism Intent Psychiatric Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arie Willem Cloete

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant acted in a state of automatism at the time of the shootings.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant possessed the requisite criminal capacity and intent for murder.
  3. 3 Whether the trial court erred in rejecting the appellant's version and convicting him of murder.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant's version of acting in a state of automatism was not credible. The evidence, including his conduct before and after the shootings, the content of his letters and phone calls, and his statements to witnesses, demonstrated that he acted consciously and purposefully. The expert psychiatric evidence from Dr Vorster supported the conclusion that the appellant was able to appreciate the wrongfulness of his actions and act accordingly. The trial court was justified in rejecting the appellant's version and convicting him of murder. The appeal against conviction was dismissed as the findings of guilt were fully supported by the evidence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court are confirmed.