Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

S v Cossa (96/2015) [2015] ZAFSHC 115 (25 June 2015)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The magistrate's order declaring the accused unfit to possess a firearm was ultra vires, as section 103 of the Firearms Control Act, 60 of 2000 does not apply to the offence for which the accused was convicted. The accused was properly convicted and sentenced for contravening section 49(1)(a) of Act 13 of 2002, but the additional order regarding firearm competency was not authorized by law and must be set aside. The sentence of a fine of R1,000 or three months' imprisonment is confirmed as appropriate.

Court disposition

The sentence is amended to exclude the order declaring the accused unfit to possess a firearm. The accused is sentenced to a fine of R1,000 or three months' imprisonment.

Orders

  • The accused is sentenced to a fine of R1,000 or three months' imprisonment.
  • The order declaring the accused unfit to possess a firearm is set aside.

02

Material facts

Parties

The State

Applicant

Rui Vincente Cossa

Respondent Counsel: Me Seati

Amounts and remedies

  • Fine Imposed: ZAR 1,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Review Application / Special Review Under Section 304(4) of Act 51 of 1977

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The State prosecuted the accused for contravening section 49(1)(a) of Act 13 of 2002, alleging he was an illegal foreigner. The accused pleaded guilty and was convicted and sentenced. The magistrate further declared the accused unfit to possess a firearm under section 103(2) of Act 60 of 2000.
Respondent
The accused, represented by Me Seati, confirmed the guilty plea and accepted the sentence. No specific argument was advanced regarding the firearm declaration.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000, section 103

    Section 103 of the Firearms Control Act, 60 of 2000 does not apply to convictions under section 49(1)(a) of Act 13 of 2002, as the offence is not listed in Schedule 2 nor does it warrant an enquiry into firearm competency.

  2. 02

    Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000, section 103(1)(a)-(o), 103(2)

    A court may only declare a person unfit to possess a firearm if convicted of offences listed in Schedule 2 or where the statute expressly provides for such an enquiry.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The magistrate's order declaring the accused unfit to possess a firearm was ultra vires, as section 103 of the Firearms Control Act, 60 of 2000 does not apply to the offence for which the accused was convicted. The accused was properly convicted and sentenced for contravening section 49(1)(a) of Act 13 of 2002, but the additional order regarding firearm competency was not authorized by law and must be set aside. The sentence of a fine of R1,000 or three months' imprisonment is confirmed as appropriate.

Obiter and limits

  • Clerks of the court should ensure that orders regarding firearm competency are only made where authorized by statute.
  • Magistrates must carefully consider the applicability of statutory provisions before making ancillary orders.

Court disposition

The sentence is amended to exclude the order declaring the accused unfit to possess a firearm. The accused is sentenced to a fine of R1,000 or three months' imprisonment.

  • The accused is sentenced to a fine of R1,000 or three months' imprisonment.
  • The order declaring the accused unfit to possess a firearm is set aside.

Source and reliance status

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

Judgment

[2015] ZAFSHC 115

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN

Review Number : 96/2015

In the review of:

THE

STATE

and

RUI VINCENTE COSSA

CORAM:

NAIDOO, J et WILLIAMS, AJ

JUDGMENT BY: WILLIAMS, AJ

DELIVERED ON: 25 JUNE 2015

[1] This is a special review under section 304(4) of Act 51 of 1977.

[2] The accused was charged with contravening section 49(1)(a) of Act 13 of 2002- Illegal Foreigner, in the magistrate’s court, Welkom. The accused was represented by Me Seati who confirmed the plea of guilty by the accused in terms of section 112(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act. After his written statement in terms of the Act had been read into the record, the learned magistrate found the accused guilty as charged.

[3] The accused was thereupon sentenced to a fine of R1 000,00 or three months’ imprisonment. In terms of section 103(2) of Act 60 of 2000, the accused was furthermore declared unfit to possess a firearm. In this regard the clerk of the court has also informed the registrar of the Firearms Registry Centre of the magistrate’s order declaring the accused unfit to possess a firearm.

[4] The provisions of section 103 of the Firearms Control Act, 60 of 2000 are, however, not applicable in this instance. Section 103(1)(a) – 103(1)(o) as well as section 103(2) with reference to schedule 2 does not warrant an enquiry into the competency of a person to possess a firearm. This part of the order is therefore ultra vires.

[5] I therefore propose that the following order be made:

The sentence of the court a quo is amended to read as follows:

1. The accused is sentenced to a fine of R1 000,00 or three months’ imprisonment.

_________

A. WILLIAMS, AJ

I agree:

______

S. NAIDOO, J

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Immigration Act 13 of 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.