S v Dlamini (1210/2000) [2000] ZAGPHC 3 (16 August 2000)
The magistrate correctly found the accused guilty of failing to pay maintenance. However, the amount of arrears proved was R5750, not R9100 as charged. The conviction must be amended to reflect the correct amount, ensuring that the sentence, when imposed, is based on accurate facts. The review court exercises its power to correct the record before sentence is passed.
- Citation
- [2000] ZAGPHC 3
- Parties
- Applicant: The State; Respondent: Maswazi Dlamini
- Court
- High Courts - Gauteng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2000
- Case Number
- 1210/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Special Review Before Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction amended to reflect arrears of R5750 instead of R9100. Sentence not yet imposed.
- Judges
- N.P. Willis, G.M. Makhanya
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance Order, Failure to Pay Maintenance, Criminal Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Applicant
Maswazi Dlamini
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Special Review Before Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was correctly convicted for failing to pay maintenance under Section 11(1) of Act 23 of 1963.
- 2 Whether the amount of arrears was correctly determined for the conviction.
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate correctly found the accused guilty of failing to pay maintenance. However, the amount of arrears proved was R5750, not R9100 as charged. The conviction must be amended to reflect the correct amount, ensuring that the sentence, when imposed, is based on accurate facts. The review court exercises its power to correct the record before sentence is passed.
Court Disposition
Conviction amended to reflect arrears of R5750 instead of R9100. Sentence not yet imposed.
Orders
- The conviction is amended to read: The accused is found guilty of contravening Section 11(1) of Act 23 of 1963 but only to the extent of R5750 and not R9100 as charged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment