S v Ferreira (30/88) [1988] ZASCA 30 (29 March 1988)

S v Ferreira (30/88) [1988] ZASCA 30 (29 March 1988)

The court found that the evidence overwhelmingly indicated that the appellant was the last person in the company of the deceased prior to her death, had previously assaulted her, and possessed injuries consistent with a struggle. The appellant's own statements and conduct demonstrated that he was aware of his actions and acted with calculation, despite his intoxication. The medical evidence confirmed that the deceased died from strangulation, and there was no credible evidence implicating any other person. The appellant failed to provide any explanation for the injuries found on both himself and the deceased, nor did he testify to rebut the State's case. The court held that the State had...

Citation
[1988] ZASCA 30
Parties
Appellant: Edward Gerhard Ferreira; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 March 1988
Case Number
30/88
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
Judges
Hoexter, Smalberger, Arr, Boshoff
Legal Topics
Murder, Intoxication, Onus of Proof, Intent, Mental Capacity
Criminal Law Murder Intoxication Onus of Proof Intent Mental Capacity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Gerhard Ferreira

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the State proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant caused the death of the deceased.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was criminally responsible (toerekeningsvatbaar) at the time of the offence given his intoxication.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant had the requisite intent to commit murder.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the evidence overwhelmingly indicated that the appellant was the last person in the company of the deceased prior to her death, had previously assaulted her, and possessed injuries consistent with a struggle. The appellant's own statements and conduct demonstrated that he was aware of his actions and acted with calculation, despite his intoxication. The medical evidence confirmed that the deceased died from strangulation, and there was no credible evidence implicating any other person. The appellant failed to provide any explanation for the injuries found on both himself and the deceased, nor did he testify to rebut the State's case. The court held that the State had...

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal against both conviction and sentence is dismissed.