S v Greeff (640/94) [1995] ZASCA 95 (14 September 1995)
The court held that the process used to determine the blood alcohol concentration, as described by the forensic analyst, is fundamentally a chemical process requiring expertise in chemistry. The use of a computer (integrator) to process results does not alter the chemical nature of the analysis or undermine the evidentiary value of the certificate. The certificate complied with all statutory requirements and was admissible as prima facie proof of the appellant's blood alcohol concentration. No evidence was presented to rebut the certificate's prima facie status; in fact, the defence witness confirmed the reliability of the process. The appellant's arguments regarding the simplicity of the...
- Citation
- [1995] ZASCA 95
- Parties
- Appellant: Alfonso Deon Greeff; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 1995
- Case Number
- 640/94
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.
- Judges
- E M Grosskopf, Nestadt, Arr, Scott
- Legal Topics
- Driving Under Influence, Admissibility of Certificate, Forensic Evidence, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alfonso Deon Greeff
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate issued under section 212(4)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act is admissible as prima facie proof of blood alcohol concentration.
- 2 Whether the process used to determine blood alcohol concentration requires expertise in chemistry as contemplated by the statute.
- 3 Whether the use of a computer (integrator) in the analysis affects the evidentiary value of the certificate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the process used to determine the blood alcohol concentration, as described by the forensic analyst, is fundamentally a chemical process requiring expertise in chemistry. The use of a computer (integrator) to process results does not alter the chemical nature of the analysis or undermine the evidentiary value of the certificate. The certificate complied with all statutory requirements and was admissible as prima facie proof of the appellant's blood alcohol concentration. No evidence was presented to rebut the certificate's prima facie status; in fact, the defence witness confirmed the reliability of the process. The appellant's arguments regarding the simplicity of the...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The conviction and sentence are confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment