S v Jeffrey (241/2008) [2008] ZAFSHC 78 (11 July 2008)

S v Jeffrey (241/2008) [2008] ZAFSHC 78 (11 July 2008)

The court found that the accused was properly convicted on his plea of guilty for housebreaking with intent to steal and theft. The sentence of 9 months imprisonment wholly suspended for 3 years was not unduly lenient and did not warrant interference. However, the conditions attached to the suspension were incorrectly worded, as conceded by the magistrate. The court exercised its review powers to correct the wording, ensuring that the suspension is conditional upon the accused not being convicted of housebreaking with intent to commit any crime or attempt thereto, or theft or attempted theft, during the period of suspension.

Citation
[2008] ZAFSHC 78
Parties
Respondent: THE STATE; Applicant: XOLILE ALI JEFFREY
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
11 July 2008
Case Number
241/2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review / Review of Sentence
Outcome
Conviction confirmed; sentence altered to correct the conditions of suspension.
Judges
VAN DER MERWE
Legal Topics
Housebreaking, Conditional Suspension of Sentence, Review Proceedings
Criminal Law Housebreaking Conditional Suspension of Sentence Review Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

THE STATE

Respondent

XOLILE ALI JEFFREY

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Review / Review of Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the magistrate was appropriate and correctly worded.
  2. 2 Whether the conditions of suspension were properly formulated.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the accused was properly convicted on his plea of guilty for housebreaking with intent to steal and theft. The sentence of 9 months imprisonment wholly suspended for 3 years was not unduly lenient and did not warrant interference. However, the conditions attached to the suspension were incorrectly worded, as conceded by the magistrate. The court exercised its review powers to correct the wording, ensuring that the suspension is conditional upon the accused not being convicted of housebreaking with intent to commit any crime or attempt thereto, or theft or attempted theft, during the period of suspension.

Court Disposition

Conviction confirmed; sentence altered to correct the conditions of suspension.

Orders

  • The conviction is confirmed.
  • The sentence is altered to read: The accused is sentenced to 9 months imprisonment wholly suspended for a period of 3 years on condition that the accused is not convicted of housebreaking with intent to commit any crime or attempt thereto or theft or attempted theft committed during the period of suspension.