S v Jordaan and Others (CC20/2017) [2018] ZAWCHC 10 (7 February 2018)
The court found that the offences were serious manifestations of gang-related violence in Manenberg, with aggravating features including the use of firearms and the vulnerability of the victims. The personal circumstances of the accused, while unfortunate, did not constitute substantial and compelling circumstances to deviate from the prescribed minimum sentences. Accused 2 was sentenced to an effective seven years' imprisonment for attempted murder and related firearm offences, taking into account time spent in custody and the cumulative effect of the sentences. Accused 1 received an effective 24 years' imprisonment for murder and related firearm offences, and accused 4 was sentenced to...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAWCHC 10
- Parties
- Applicant: THE STATE; Defendant: Nizaam Jordaan; Defendant: Shalomodien Dollie; Defendant: Manzan Maart; Defendant: Rozario Lottering; Defendant: Yusrie Benting
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 February 2018
- Case Number
- CC20/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law / Sentencing After Conviction
- Outcome
- Accused 2 sentenced to seven years' imprisonment; accused 1 sentenced to 24 years' imprisonment; accused 4 sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment; accused 3 and 5 acquitted and discharged.
- Judges
- A G Binns-Ward
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Minimum Sentences, Gang Related Offences, Unlawful Possession of Firearms, Attempted Murder, Murder
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE STATE
Applicant
Nizaam Jordaan
Defendant
Shalomodien Dollie
Defendant
Manzan Maart
Defendant
Rozario Lottering
Defendant
Yusrie Benting
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law / Sentencing After Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for each accused convicted of murder, attempted murder, and unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition?
- 2 Are there substantial and compelling circumstances to justify deviation from the prescribed minimum sentence for murder?
- 3 How should the court address delays caused by legal representatives' diary clashes under s 342A of the Criminal Procedure Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the offences were serious manifestations of gang-related violence in Manenberg, with aggravating features including the use of firearms and the vulnerability of the victims. The personal circumstances of the accused, while unfortunate, did not constitute substantial and compelling circumstances to deviate from the prescribed minimum sentences. Accused 2 was sentenced to an effective seven years' imprisonment for attempted murder and related firearm offences, taking into account time spent in custody and the cumulative effect of the sentences. Accused 1 received an effective 24 years' imprisonment for murder and related firearm offences, and accused 4 was sentenced to...
Court Disposition
Accused 2 sentenced to seven years' imprisonment; accused 1 sentenced to 24 years' imprisonment; accused 4 sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment; accused 3 and 5 acquitted and discharged.
Orders
- Accused 2 (Shalomodien Dollie): Five years' imprisonment for attempted murder (count 2); five years' imprisonment for unlawful possession of firearm (count 4); two years' imprisonment for unlawful possession of ammunition (count 5). Sentence on count 5 and three years of count 4 to run concurrently with count 2,...
- Accused 1 (Nizaam Jordaan): Twenty years' imprisonment for murder (count 7); eight years' imprisonment for unlawful possession of firearm (count 9); four years' imprisonment for unlawful possession of ammunition (count 10). Sentence on count 10 and four years of count 9 to run concurrently with count 7, effective 24...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment