S v Jordaan (307/92) [1993] ZASCA 184 (29 November 1993)

S v Jordaan (307/92) [1993] ZASCA 184 (29 November 1993)

The court found that neither the appellants' anti-social personality disorder nor the frustration arising from prison conditions constituted sufficient mitigation to avoid the death penalty. The psychological evidence did not establish a direct link between their disorders and the commission of the murder, which was planned and executed with deliberation. The gang subculture and alleged influence by Saayman did not diminish Jordaan's responsibility, as both appellants acted voluntarily and enthusiastically. The court held that the gravity of the offence, the interests of society, and the need for deterrence outweighed any mitigating factors. Accordingly, the death sentence was the only...

Citation
[1993] ZASCA 184
Parties
Appellant: Raymond Jordaan; Appellant: Selwyn Saayman; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 November 1993
Case Number
307/92
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
The appeal by both appellants against the death sentence is dismissed.
Judges
Eksteen, Van Heerden, Van den Heever
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Mitigating Factors, Death Penalty, Anti Social Personality Disorder, Gang Influence, Murder
Criminal Law Sentencing Mitigating Factors Death Penalty Anti Social Personality Disorder Gang Influence Murder

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Raymond Jordaan

Appellant

Selwyn Saayman

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the death sentence imposed on the appellants was appropriate given the alleged mitigating factors.
  2. 2 Whether anti-social personality disorder and prison gang culture constitute sufficient mitigation to avoid the death penalty.
  3. 3 Whether the appellants' personal circumstances and psychological evidence justify a lesser sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that neither the appellants' anti-social personality disorder nor the frustration arising from prison conditions constituted sufficient mitigation to avoid the death penalty. The psychological evidence did not establish a direct link between their disorders and the commission of the murder, which was planned and executed with deliberation. The gang subculture and alleged influence by Saayman did not diminish Jordaan's responsibility, as both appellants acted voluntarily and enthusiastically. The court held that the gravity of the offence, the interests of society, and the need for deterrence outweighed any mitigating factors. Accordingly, the death sentence was the only...

Court Disposition

The appeal by both appellants against the death sentence is dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeals of Raymond Jordaan and Selwyn Saayman against the death sentences imposed upon them are dismissed.
  • The death sentences imposed by the trial court are confirmed.