S v Khambule and Others (79/99) [2001] ZASCA 43; [2001] 3 All SA 274 (A); 2001 (1) SACR 501 (SCA) (26 March 2001)

S v Khambule and Others (79/99) [2001] ZASCA 43; [2001] 3 All SA 274 (A); 2001 (1) SACR 501 (SCA) (26 March 2001)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the convictions for robbery of the Ruger rifle, unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition, and attempted murder of police officers were justified under the doctrine of common purpose. The evidence established that the appellants planned and executed the robbery as a group, foreseeing and reconciling themselves with the possibility of overcoming and disarming the security personnel, and thus the taking and possession of the Ruger rifle and ammunition was a necessary part of their plan. The firing at police officers during the escape was a foreseeable risk inherent in their joint criminal enterprise, and all appellants were liable for attempted...

Citation
[2001] ZASCA 43
Parties
Appellant: Phodi Simon Khambule; Appellant: Samuel Lehlohonolo Khoza; Appellant: Sipho Steven Ngubane; Appellant: Kenneth Vusumizi Mabizela; Appellant: Thembile Mahamule; Appellant: Eric Thozamile Mhlanli; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 March 2001
Case Number
79/99
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Convictions and Sentences From the Free State Provincial Division
Outcome
Appeals against convictions and sentences dismissed, except for reduction of certain sentences for the fifth appellant.
Judges
Olivier, Zulman, Mthiyane
Legal Topics
Common Purpose, Armed Robbery, Attempted Murder, Unlawful Possession of Firearms, Sentencing Principles, Minimum Sentences
Criminal Law Common Purpose Armed Robbery Attempted Murder Unlawful Possession of Firearms Sentencing Principles Minimum Sentences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phodi Simon Khambule

Appellant

Samuel Lehlohonolo Khoza

Appellant

Sipho Steven Ngubane

Appellant

Kenneth Vusumizi Mabizela

Appellant

Thembile Mahamule

Appellant

Eric Thozamile Mhlanli

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Convictions and Sentences From the Free State Provincial Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellants were correctly convicted of robbery of the Ruger rifle under the doctrine of common purpose.
  2. 2 Whether the convictions for unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition can be sustained on the basis of common purpose.
  3. 3 Whether all appellants can be held liable for attempted murder of police officers during the escape.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the convictions for robbery of the Ruger rifle, unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition, and attempted murder of police officers were justified under the doctrine of common purpose. The evidence established that the appellants planned and executed the robbery as a group, foreseeing and reconciling themselves with the possibility of overcoming and disarming the security personnel, and thus the taking and possession of the Ruger rifle and ammunition was a necessary part of their plan. The firing at police officers during the escape was a foreseeable risk inherent in their joint criminal enterprise, and all appellants were liable for attempted...

Court Disposition

Appeals against convictions and sentences dismissed, except for reduction of certain sentences for the fifth appellant.

Orders

  • The appeals of all appellants against their respective convictions are dismissed.
  • The appeals against all sentences imposed on appellants 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 are dismissed.