S v Kusse (192/90) [1991] ZASCA 153 (21 November 1991)

S v Kusse (192/90) [1991] ZASCA 153 (21 November 1991)

The court found that, despite minor inconsistencies in the State witnesses' accounts, their evidence was credible and corroborated on material aspects. The appellant's alibi was not reasonably possibly true, as his own and his wife's testimonies were unsatisfactory and contradicted by other evidence, including the identification by witnesses and a police officer. The court held that the appellant's conviction for dealing in heroin was proved beyond reasonable doubt. Regarding sentence, the court found no misdirection or grounds for interference, as the sentence was not shockingly inappropriate given the nature and quantity of the drugs involved. The appeal against both conviction and...

Citation
[1991] ZASCA 153
Parties
Appellant: Dumile Kusse; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 November 1991
Case Number
192/90
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in the Regional Court, Confirmed and Partially Suspended by the Cape Provincial Division; Current Appeal With Leave of the Court a Quo.
Outcome
Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
Judges
Smalberger, Goldstone, Harms
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Alibi Defence, Credibility of Witnesses, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Drug Trafficking Alibi Defence Credibility of Witnesses Appeal Against Conviction Appeal Against Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dumile Kusse

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in the Regional Court, Confirmed and Partially Suspended by the Cape Provincial Division; Current Appeal With Leave of the Court a Quo.

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's conviction for dealing in heroin was proved beyond reasonable doubt.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's alibi defence was reasonably possibly true.
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, despite minor inconsistencies in the State witnesses' accounts, their evidence was credible and corroborated on material aspects. The appellant's alibi was not reasonably possibly true, as his own and his wife's testimonies were unsatisfactory and contradicted by other evidence, including the identification by witnesses and a police officer. The court held that the appellant's conviction for dealing in heroin was proved beyond reasonable doubt. Regarding sentence, the court found no misdirection or grounds for interference, as the sentence was not shockingly inappropriate given the nature and quantity of the drugs involved. The appeal against both conviction and...

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • The appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.