S v Lenting and Others (CC08/2018) [2023] ZAWCHC 168; 2023 (2) SACR 409 (WCC) (24 July 2023)
The court found that the jurisdictional requirements of sections 153 and 158 of the Criminal Procedure Act were satisfied. The witness is highly vulnerable, suffering from PTSD, pregnant, and fears for her safety due to the gang-related nature of the charges. Expert evidence was uncontested regarding the risk of further trauma if she testified in open court. The court held that the protection of vulnerable witnesses is not limited to sexual offences or child witnesses and that the accused's right to a fair trial must be balanced against the interests of justice and the protection of witnesses. The facility for closed-circuit testimony was available, and the accused's ability to...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAWCHC 168
- Parties
- Applicant: The State; Respondent: Elton Lenting; Respondent: Accused 2; Respondent: Accused 3; Respondent: Accused 9
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2023
- Case Number
- CC08/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Protective Measures for Witness Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Application granted; protective measures for the witness ordered.
- Judges
- Lekhuleni
- Legal Topics
- Witness Protection, Closed Circuit Testimony, Fair Trial Rights, Gang Related Offences, Administration of Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Applicant
Elton Lenting
Respondent
Accused 2
Respondent
Accused 3
Respondent
Accused 9
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Protective Measures for Witness Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the witness should be permitted to testify via closed-circuit television and in camera due to trauma and security concerns.
- 2 Whether the identity of the witness should be withheld from the public.
- 3 Whether granting such protective measures infringes the accused's right to a fair and public trial.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the jurisdictional requirements of sections 153 and 158 of the Criminal Procedure Act were satisfied. The witness is highly vulnerable, suffering from PTSD, pregnant, and fears for her safety due to the gang-related nature of the charges. Expert evidence was uncontested regarding the risk of further trauma if she testified in open court. The court held that the protection of vulnerable witnesses is not limited to sexual offences or child witnesses and that the accused's right to a fair trial must be balanced against the interests of justice and the protection of witnesses. The facility for closed-circuit testimony was available, and the accused's ability to...
Court Disposition
Application granted; protective measures for the witness ordered.
Orders
- The witness shall testify through closed-circuit television.
- The evidence of the witness will be heard behind closed doors.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment