S v Lesetla and Another (8/88) [1989] ZASCA 50 (31 March 1989)

S v Lesetla and Another (8/88) [1989] ZASCA 50 (31 March 1989)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court's finding of no extenuating circumstances was reasonable and justified by the evidence. The appellants' confessions and statements, corroborated by other evidence, established their active participation in the murder and robbery. The court found that the intention to kill was clearly formed, either at the outset or during the attack, and that the appellants' conduct was brutal and deliberate. The trial judge considered the appellants' lack of intelligence, education, and primitive background but correctly concluded that these factors did not reduce their moral blameworthiness in the circumstances. There was no misdirection or...

Citation
[1989] ZASCA 50
Parties
Appellant: Lipitsa Ralebathe Lesetla; Appellant: Motlalapula Mabeta; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
31 March 1989
Case Number
8/88
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Finding of No Extenuating Circumstances and Sentence
Outcome
The appeals of both appellants are dismissed.
Judges
Hoexter, Steyn, F.H. Grosskopf
Legal Topics
Murder, Common Purpose, Extenuating Circumstances, Admissibility of Confessions, Sentencing, Moral Blameworthiness
Criminal Law Murder Common Purpose Extenuating Circumstances Admissibility of Confessions Sentencing Moral Blameworthiness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lipitsa Ralebathe Lesetla

Appellant

Motlalapula Mabeta

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Finding of No Extenuating Circumstances and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial court erred in finding no extenuating circumstances in relation to the murder conviction.
  2. 2 Whether the death sentence imposed on the appellants should be set aside.
  3. 3 Whether the confessions and statements made by the appellants were properly admitted and relied upon.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court's finding of no extenuating circumstances was reasonable and justified by the evidence. The appellants' confessions and statements, corroborated by other evidence, established their active participation in the murder and robbery. The court found that the intention to kill was clearly formed, either at the outset or during the attack, and that the appellants' conduct was brutal and deliberate. The trial judge considered the appellants' lack of intelligence, education, and primitive background but correctly concluded that these factors did not reduce their moral blameworthiness in the circumstances. There was no misdirection or...

Court Disposition

The appeals of both appellants are dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeals against conviction and sentence are dismissed.
  • The death sentences imposed by the trial court stand.