S v Liebenberg (CC90/2014) [2015] ZAGPPHC 1111 (19 November 2015)

S v Liebenberg (CC90/2014) [2015] ZAGPPHC 1111 (19 November 2015)

The court found that the accused laid a sufficient foundation for the defence of temporary non-pathological criminal incapacity, supported by uncontested expert evidence from Prof Scholtz. The accused was subjected to extreme provocation and assault, leading to a state of dissociation and traumatic amnesia during the shooting. The court was not satisfied that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused acted with criminal intent or conscious direction. The evidence established a reasonable doubt as to whether the accused was able to exercise control over his actions at the relevant time. The self-defence argument was found to be academic, as the incapacity defence...

Citation
[2015] ZAGPPHC 1111
Parties
Applicant: The State; Respondent: Retief Liebenberg
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 November 2015
Case Number
CC90/2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Judgment
Outcome
The accused is acquitted of both counts of murder.
Judges
Ismail
Legal Topics
Murder, Non Pathological Criminal Incapacity, Self Defence, Automatism, Burden of Proof
Criminal Law Murder Non Pathological Criminal Incapacity Self Defence Automatism Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Retief Liebenberg

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Trial / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused had the requisite criminal intent to commit murder at the time of the shooting.
  2. 2 Whether the accused acted in self-defence or in a state of automatism, lacking criminal capacity.
  3. 3 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the accused laid a sufficient foundation for the defence of temporary non-pathological criminal incapacity, supported by uncontested expert evidence from Prof Scholtz. The accused was subjected to extreme provocation and assault, leading to a state of dissociation and traumatic amnesia during the shooting. The court was not satisfied that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused acted with criminal intent or conscious direction. The evidence established a reasonable doubt as to whether the accused was able to exercise control over his actions at the relevant time. The self-defence argument was found to be academic, as the incapacity defence...

Court Disposition

The accused is acquitted of both counts of murder.

Orders

  • The accused, Retief Liebenberg, is acquitted on both counts of murder.