S v Lukhwa and Another (698/92) [1993] ZASCA 177 (23 November 1993)

S v Lukhwa and Another (698/92) [1993] ZASCA 177 (23 November 1993)

The court found that, although the appellants' own testimony regarding their belief in witchcraft was not credible, the broader evidence indicated that their actions were motivated by a deep-seated fear and belief in witchcraft prevalent in their community. The murders were committed in the context of a witch-hunt, and the brutality of the acts reflected the intensity of this belief. However, the court determined that this belief, while not excusing the crimes, constituted a mitigating factor sufficient to justify setting aside the death sentences. The court held that life imprisonment was a more appropriate sentence, considering the temporary nature of witch-hunts in Venda at the time...

Citation
[1993] ZASCA 177
Parties
Appellant: Avhapfani Joseph Lukhwa; Appellant: Tshamaano Edson Tshibalo; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 November 1993
Case Number
698/92
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against the death sentences succeeds; death sentences set aside and replaced with life imprisonment.
Judges
Hefer, Van Coller, Harms
Legal Topics
Mitigating Factors, Belief in Witchcraft, Sentencing Discretion, Murder, Extenuating Circumstances
Criminal Law Mitigating Factors Belief in Witchcraft Sentencing Discretion Murder Extenuating Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Avhapfani Joseph Lukhwa

Appellant

Tshamaano Edson Tshibalo

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the death sentences imposed on the appellants for multiple counts of murder were appropriate in light of alleged mitigating factors.
  2. 2 Whether the appellants' claimed belief in witchcraft constituted a substantial mitigating factor.
  3. 3 Whether the circumstances justified substituting the death penalty with life imprisonment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, although the appellants' own testimony regarding their belief in witchcraft was not credible, the broader evidence indicated that their actions were motivated by a deep-seated fear and belief in witchcraft prevalent in their community. The murders were committed in the context of a witch-hunt, and the brutality of the acts reflected the intensity of this belief. However, the court determined that this belief, while not excusing the crimes, constituted a mitigating factor sufficient to justify setting aside the death sentences. The court held that life imprisonment was a more appropriate sentence, considering the temporary nature of witch-hunts in Venda at the time...

Court Disposition

Appeal against the death sentences succeeds; death sentences set aside and replaced with life imprisonment.

Orders

  • The death sentences imposed on both appellants are set aside.
  • Each appellant is sentenced to life imprisonment for each count of murder.