S v Maphike (172/93) [1993] ZASCA 106 (31 August 1993)

S v Maphike (172/93) [1993] ZASCA 106 (31 August 1993)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the trial judge correctly admitted the confession, as Captain Steyn had informed the appellant of his right to parental assistance and the appellant declined such assistance. Although further efforts to contact the parents could have been made, the evidence showed that the confession was made freely and voluntarily, and the appellant was sufficiently mature and intelligent. Even without the confession, the conviction was supported by strong identification evidence and the appellant's possession of the alarm transmitter taken from the deceased. The appellant's evidence was found to be dishonest and was rejected beyond reasonable doubt, while the State...

Citation
[1993] ZASCA 106
Parties
Appellant: Thebogo Harold Maphike; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
31 August 1993
Case Number
172/93
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Only; Leave to Appeal Granted by Trial Judge
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; convictions upheld.
Judges
Smalberger, Milne, Eksteen
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Confession, Youthful Offender, Parental Assistance, Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances, Murder, Identification Evidence
Criminal Law Admissibility of Confession Youthful Offender Parental Assistance Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances Murder Identification Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thebogo Harold Maphike

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Only; Leave to Appeal Granted by Trial Judge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the confession made by the appellant was admissible given his age and absence of parental assistance.
  2. 2 Whether the convictions for robbery with aggravating circumstances and murder were supported by the evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the trial judge correctly admitted the confession, as Captain Steyn had informed the appellant of his right to parental assistance and the appellant declined such assistance. Although further efforts to contact the parents could have been made, the evidence showed that the confession was made freely and voluntarily, and the appellant was sufficiently mature and intelligent. Even without the confession, the conviction was supported by strong identification evidence and the appellant's possession of the alarm transmitter taken from the deceased. The appellant's evidence was found to be dishonest and was rejected beyond reasonable doubt, while the State...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; convictions upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.