S v Mashile (CC08/2019) [2020] ZAMPMBHC 6 (25 March 2020)
The court found that the accused, Pat Mashile, was conclusively linked to the serial rapes and robberies by overwhelming forensic DNA evidence. The DNA profile from semen found in the victims matched buccal swabs taken from the accused, with no evidence of tampering or contamination. The identification evidence by several victims was credible, and the accused's denials were illogical, unsupported, and contradicted by the physical evidence. The accused's version did not create a reasonable doubt. The court held that the State proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused was found guilty on all remaining charges. Minimum sentencing provisions under Act 105 of 1997 were applicable.
- Citation
- [2020] ZAMPMBHC 6
- Parties
- Applicant: The State; Respondent: Pat Mashile
- Court
- Mbombela High Court, Mpumalanga
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2020
- Case Number
- CC08/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Judgment
- Outcome
- The accused is found guilty as charged in respect of all the remaining charges – Counts 1-6 & 8-26.
- Judges
- T.V. Ratshibvumo
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Dna Evidence, Identification Evidence, Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances, Criminal Procedure Act, Minimum Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Applicant
Pat Mashile
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is the perpetrator of the serial rapes and robberies charged.
- 2 Whether the DNA evidence reliably links the accused to the offences.
- 3 Whether the identification evidence by victims is credible and sufficient.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused, Pat Mashile, was conclusively linked to the serial rapes and robberies by overwhelming forensic DNA evidence. The DNA profile from semen found in the victims matched buccal swabs taken from the accused, with no evidence of tampering or contamination. The identification evidence by several victims was credible, and the accused's denials were illogical, unsupported, and contradicted by the physical evidence. The accused's version did not create a reasonable doubt. The court held that the State proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused was found guilty on all remaining charges. Minimum sentencing provisions under Act 105 of 1997 were applicable.
Court Disposition
The accused is found guilty as charged in respect of all the remaining charges – Counts 1-6 & 8-26.
Orders
- The accused is convicted on Counts 1-6 and 8-26.
- Section 51(1) of Act 105 of 1997 applies to counts 4, 18, 20 & 21; section 51(2) applies to the rest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment