S v Masiane (522/91) [1992] ZASCA 80 (22 May 1992)

S v Masiane (522/91) [1992] ZASCA 80 (22 May 1992)

The court found that, although the offences were serious and committed with aggravating circumstances, the appellant was a young first offender who had been influenced by an older and more dominant co-accused. The murder was not premeditated but occurred when the deceased resisted unexpectedly. The appellant's confession and evidence indicated a subordinate role, and there was no evidence of inherent violence or criminal inclination prior to his association with Ntshangase. The court held that the mitigating factors outweighed the aggravating ones, and that the death sentence was not the only appropriate punishment. The sentences of death imposed for murder and robbery were set aside and...

Citation
[1992] ZASCA 80
Parties
Appellant: Nathaniel Masiane; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 May 1992
Case Number
522/91
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal upheld. Death sentences set aside and replaced with life imprisonment and twelve years' imprisonment.
Judges
L van den Heever, Hefer, Goldstone
Legal Topics
Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances, Murder, Sentencing Principles, Extenuating Circumstances
Criminal Law Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances Murder Sentencing Principles Extenuating Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nathaniel Masiane

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the death sentences imposed on the appellant for murder and robbery with aggravating circumstances were appropriate.
  2. 2 Whether extenuating circumstances existed to justify a lesser sentence.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant's role and personal circumstances warranted mitigation of sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, although the offences were serious and committed with aggravating circumstances, the appellant was a young first offender who had been influenced by an older and more dominant co-accused. The murder was not premeditated but occurred when the deceased resisted unexpectedly. The appellant's confession and evidence indicated a subordinate role, and there was no evidence of inherent violence or criminal inclination prior to his association with Ntshangase. The court held that the mitigating factors outweighed the aggravating ones, and that the death sentence was not the only appropriate punishment. The sentences of death imposed for murder and robbery were set aside and...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld. Death sentences set aside and replaced with life imprisonment and twelve years' imprisonment.

Orders

  • The sentence of death imposed on the appellant for the murder of Doreen Mbelani is set aside and replaced by one of life imprisonment.
  • The sentence of death imposed on the appellant for the robbery which led to the death of Doreen Mbelani is set aside and replaced by one of twelve years' imprisonment.