S v Matsitela and Others (78/2017) [2018] ZAFSHC 135 (13 September 2018)

S v Matsitela and Others (78/2017) [2018] ZAFSHC 135 (13 September 2018)

The court found that the State proved beyond reasonable doubt that all accused participated in an enterprise engaged in copper theft and related offences, managed by accused 1. Cellphone data, counter books, and witness testimony established linkages between the accused and the crime scenes. The court accepted the attribution of cellphone numbers to the accused and found the circumstantial evidence compelling. The accused's attempts to retract formal admissions and challenge the evidence were rejected as lacking credibility. The court held that the offences of theft and tampering with essential infrastructure are distinct, and no duplication of convictions arises. The accused were...

Citation
[2018] ZAFSHC 135
Parties
Applicant: The State; Respondent: Malome Alfred Matsitela; Respondent: Steven Langa; Respondent: Amos Ngubeni; Respondent: Andries Mkhumbuza
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 September 2018
Case Number
78/2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Verdict and Orders
Outcome
Accused 1 is convicted of managing an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activities (count 1). Accused 1, 2, 3, and 4 are convicted of participating in the activities of an enterprise through racketeering (count 2). All four accused are convicted of theft (counts 3, 4, and 5). Accused 3 and 4 are convicted...
Judges
Daffue
Legal Topics
Racketeering, Theft of Essential Infrastructure, Prevention of Corrupt Activities Act, Criminal Matters Amendment Act, Cellphone Evidence, Duplication of Convictions
Criminal Law Commercial and Corporate Racketeering Theft of Essential Infrastructure Prevention of Corrupt Activities Act Criminal Matters Amendment Act Cellphone Evidence Duplication of Convictions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Malome Alfred Matsitela

Respondent

Steven Langa

Respondent

Amos Ngubeni

Respondent

Andries Mkhumbuza

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Trial / Verdict and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused participated in an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activities as defined in POCA.
  2. 2 Whether the accused committed theft of copper cables and other infrastructure as charged.
  3. 3 Whether the accused tampered with, damaged, or destroyed essential infrastructure under the Criminal Matters Amendment Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the State proved beyond reasonable doubt that all accused participated in an enterprise engaged in copper theft and related offences, managed by accused 1. Cellphone data, counter books, and witness testimony established linkages between the accused and the crime scenes. The court accepted the attribution of cellphone numbers to the accused and found the circumstantial evidence compelling. The accused's attempts to retract formal admissions and challenge the evidence were rejected as lacking credibility. The court held that the offences of theft and tampering with essential infrastructure are distinct, and no duplication of convictions arises. The accused were...

Court Disposition

Accused 1 is convicted of managing an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activities (count 1). Accused 1, 2, 3, and 4 are convicted of participating in the activities of an enterprise through racketeering (count 2). All four accused are convicted of theft (counts 3, 4, and 5). Accused 3 and 4 are convicted...

Orders

  • Accused 1 is found guilty of contravening section 2(1)(f) of POCA during January 2014.
  • Accused 1, 2, 3, and 4 are found guilty of contravening section 2(1)(e) of POCA during January 2014.