S v Mayekiso (99/1988) [1988] ZASCA 159 (29 November 1988)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the judgment in Vuyisile Tyebela v The State, delivered on 17 November 1988, is directly applicable to the present case. For the reasons set out in that judgment, the appellant's conviction and sentence cannot stand. The appeal is therefore allowed, and both the conviction and sentence are set aside.
- Citation
- [1988] ZASCA 159
- Parties
- Appellant: Zengisile Mayekiso; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 1988
- Case Number
- 99/1988
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal
- Outcome
- The appeal is allowed. The appellant's conviction and sentence are set aside.
- Judges
- Botha, Hefer, Milne
- Legal Topics
- Conviction and Sentence, Precedent Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zengisile Mayekiso
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction and sentence of the appellant should be set aside in light of the precedent established in Vuyisile Tyebela v The State.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the judgment in Vuyisile Tyebela v The State, delivered on 17 November 1988, is directly applicable to the present case. For the reasons set out in that judgment, the appellant's conviction and sentence cannot stand. The appeal is therefore allowed, and both the conviction and sentence are set aside.
Court Disposition
The appeal is allowed. The appellant's conviction and sentence are set aside.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The appellant's conviction and sentence are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment