S v McDonald and Another (551/87) [1988] ZASCA 129 (30 September 1988)

S v McDonald and Another (551/87) [1988] ZASCA 129 (30 September 1988)

The appellate court found that the trial court correctly accepted the evidence of Erna Forbay as reliable, having approached it with the necessary caution required for single witness testimony. The court noted that the other eyewitnesses were likely influenced by fear of gang retaliation, which explained their reluctance and contradictions. The court held that the inherent probabilities supported Forbay's account and that the appellants' versions were fabricated. Both appellants were found to have acted with direct intent in the execution of a gang-related murder, and the evidence established beyond reasonable doubt their unlawful possession of the firearm and ammunition. No mitigating...

Citation
[1988] ZASCA 129
Parties
Appellant: Marlon McDonald; Appellant: Ishmael Dajee; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 September 1988
Case Number
551/87
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed. Convictions and sentences confirmed.
Judges
Rabie WHR, Steyn AR, Viljoen WAR
Legal Topics
Murder, Unlawful Possession of Firearm, Unlawful Possession of Ammunition, Single Witness Evidence, Gang Related Offences
Criminal Law Murder Unlawful Possession of Firearm Unlawful Possession of Ammunition Single Witness Evidence Gang Related Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marlon McDonald

Appellant

Ishmael Dajee

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellants were correctly convicted of murder and unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence of a single witness, Erna Forbay, was sufficiently reliable to sustain the convictions.
  3. 3 Whether any mitigating circumstances existed to justify a lesser sentence than the death penalty.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court found that the trial court correctly accepted the evidence of Erna Forbay as reliable, having approached it with the necessary caution required for single witness testimony. The court noted that the other eyewitnesses were likely influenced by fear of gang retaliation, which explained their reluctance and contradictions. The court held that the inherent probabilities supported Forbay's account and that the appellants' versions were fabricated. Both appellants were found to have acted with direct intent in the execution of a gang-related murder, and the evidence established beyond reasonable doubt their unlawful possession of the firearm and ammunition. No mitigating...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed. Convictions and sentences confirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal of both appellants is dismissed.
  • The convictions for murder and unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition are confirmed.