S v Meintjies (442/04) [2005] ZANCHC 74 (1 January 2005)

S v Meintjies (442/04) [2005] ZANCHC 74 (1 January 2005)

The magistrate's original order suspending the sentence on condition of payment towards arrears was vague and mathematically incorrect, as the payment schedule would not have satisfied the full arrears within the suspension period. The magistrate conceded the error and requested correction. The reviewing judge found that the order must be clear and enforceable, and substituted a corrected sentence specifying that the accused must comply with the existing maintenance order and pay an additional R100 per month for 59 months, with a final payment of R10 in the sixtieth month, thereby settling the full arrears of R6500 within the five-year suspension period.

Citation
[2005] ZANCHC 74
Parties
Applicant: The State; Respondent: Klaas Meintjies
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
1 January 2005
Case Number
442/04
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review / Review
Outcome
Conviction confirmed; sentence set aside and substituted with corrected suspended sentence conditions.
Judges
SA Majiedt
Legal Topics
Maintenance Order, Failure to Comply With Court Order, Sentencing Conditions
Family and Children Criminal Law Maintenance Order Failure to Comply With Court Order Sentencing Conditions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Klaas Meintjies

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Review / Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the condition of suspension attached to the sentence for failure to obey a maintenance order was sufficiently clear and enforceable.
  2. 2 Whether the magistrate's calculation and formulation of the arrears payment condition was correct.

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrate's original order suspending the sentence on condition of payment towards arrears was vague and mathematically incorrect, as the payment schedule would not have satisfied the full arrears within the suspension period. The magistrate conceded the error and requested correction. The reviewing judge found that the order must be clear and enforceable, and substituted a corrected sentence specifying that the accused must comply with the existing maintenance order and pay an additional R100 per month for 59 months, with a final payment of R10 in the sixtieth month, thereby settling the full arrears of R6500 within the five-year suspension period.

Court Disposition

Conviction confirmed; sentence set aside and substituted with corrected suspended sentence conditions.

Orders

  • The accused's conviction is confirmed.
  • The sentence imposed is set aside and substituted with: The accused is sentenced to a fine of R1000.00 or six months imprisonment, both wholly suspended for five years on condition that he complies with the existing maintenance order (R150.00 per month) and pays an additional R100.00 per month for 59 months and a...