S v Mkhabela (22/2009) [2010] ZAGPJHC 171 (10 May 2010)
On the charge of assault, the court found that the accused unlawfully and intentionally slapped Mr. Sevha Nuel Mabundla, rejecting the accused's exculpatory version as palpably false and contradicted by both his own witnesses and the State's evidence. The court accepted the corroborated testimony of the State witnesses and found that the accused was not under attack nor acting in self-defence. On the charge of murder, the court held that the State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed Mr. Owen Mabundla. The evidence regarding the snatching of the firearm was materially contradictory, and the accused's version that the fatal shot...
- Citation
- [2010] ZAGPJHC 171
- Parties
- Applicant: The State; Defendant: Jabulani Hlengani Mkhabela
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2010
- Case Number
- 22/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- The accused is acquitted on the charge of murder and convicted on the charge of assault.
- Judges
- P.A. Meyer
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Assault, Self Defence, Mens Rea, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Applicant
Jabulani Hlengani Mkhabela
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed the deceased, Mr. Owen Mabundla.
- 2 Whether the accused unlawfully and intentionally assaulted Mr. Sevha Nuel Mabundla.
- 3 Whether the accused acted in self-defence or in defence of property regarding the murder charge.
Ratio Decidendi
On the charge of assault, the court found that the accused unlawfully and intentionally slapped Mr. Sevha Nuel Mabundla, rejecting the accused's exculpatory version as palpably false and contradicted by both his own witnesses and the State's evidence. The court accepted the corroborated testimony of the State witnesses and found that the accused was not under attack nor acting in self-defence. On the charge of murder, the court held that the State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed Mr. Owen Mabundla. The evidence regarding the snatching of the firearm was materially contradictory, and the accused's version that the fatal shot...
Court Disposition
The accused is acquitted on the charge of murder and convicted on the charge of assault.
Orders
- The accused is found not guilty and discharged on count 1 (murder of Mr. Owen Mabundla).
- The accused is found guilty as charged on count 2 (assault upon Mr. Sevha Nuel Mabundla).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment