S v Mkhize (660/94) [1995] ZASCA 126 (13 November 1995)

S v Mkhize (660/94) [1995] ZASCA 126 (13 November 1995)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found no misdirection or palpable error in the trial court's assessment of the credibility of the complainant and the appellant. The medical evidence, particularly the bruising and tenderness of the complainant's neck muscles and the abrasion on her inner thigh, corroborated her account of being assaulted and contradicted the appellant's version of consensual intercourse. The explanations offered by the appellant for these injuries were deemed fanciful and unconvincing. The appellate court agreed with the lower courts that the appellant's evidence was correctly rejected. Regarding sentence, the court emphasized the seriousness of rape and found that the...

Citation
[1995] ZASCA 126
Parties
Appellant: C P Mkhize; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 November 1995
Case Number
660/94
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal against convictions and sentences dismissed.
Judges
E M Grosskopf, Vivier, Olivier
Legal Topics
Rape, Consent, Credibility of Witnesses, Sentencing Principles
Criminal Law Rape Consent Credibility of Witnesses Sentencing Principles

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C P Mkhize

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant consented to sexual intercourse on both occasions.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred in its credibility findings regarding the complainant and the appellant.
  3. 3 Whether the sentences imposed for the two counts of rape were excessive or inappropriate.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal found no misdirection or palpable error in the trial court's assessment of the credibility of the complainant and the appellant. The medical evidence, particularly the bruising and tenderness of the complainant's neck muscles and the abrasion on her inner thigh, corroborated her account of being assaulted and contradicted the appellant's version of consensual intercourse. The explanations offered by the appellant for these injuries were deemed fanciful and unconvincing. The appellate court agreed with the lower courts that the appellant's evidence was correctly rejected. Regarding sentence, the court emphasized the seriousness of rape and found that the...

Court Disposition

Appeal against convictions and sentences dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal against both convictions and sentences is dismissed.