S v Mkize (590/90) [1992] ZASCA 93 (29 May 1992)

S v Mkize (590/90) [1992] ZASCA 93 (29 May 1992)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court was correct in accepting the confession (exhibit N) as reliable and rejecting the later exculpatory statement (exhibit P), as the two were inconsistent and the appellant provided no explanation for the contradiction. The confession was detailed, voluntary, and corroborated by other evidence, such as the deceased's English cries for help. The court found no evidence of coercion or impropriety in obtaining the confession. The appellant's participation in the assault and necklacing of the deceased was established beyond reasonable doubt, justifying the conviction for murder. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Citation
[1992] ZASCA 93
Parties
Appellant: Luyanda Mkize; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 May 1992
Case Number
590/90
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed. Conviction for murder upheld.
Judges
Nestadt, Milne, Van den Heever
Legal Topics
Confession Evidence, Common Purpose, Murder, Admissibility of Statements
Criminal Law Confession Evidence Common Purpose Murder Admissibility of Statements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Luyanda Mkize

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial court correctly convicted the appellant of murder based on his confession and statements.
  2. 2 Whether the exculpatory statement (exhibit P) should have been considered together with the inculpatory confession (exhibit N).
  3. 3 Whether the trial court erred in rejecting the exculpatory portions of the appellant's statements.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court was correct in accepting the confession (exhibit N) as reliable and rejecting the later exculpatory statement (exhibit P), as the two were inconsistent and the appellant provided no explanation for the contradiction. The confession was detailed, voluntary, and corroborated by other evidence, such as the deceased's English cries for help. The court found no evidence of coercion or impropriety in obtaining the confession. The appellant's participation in the assault and necklacing of the deceased was established beyond reasonable doubt, justifying the conviction for murder. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed. Conviction for murder upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The conviction for murder stands.