S v Moletsane (R79/2004) [2004] ZAFSHC 58 (10 June 2004)

S v Moletsane (R79/2004) [2004] ZAFSHC 58 (10 June 2004)

The court found that, due to the impossibility of reconstructing the record of proceedings, it was not possible to confirm the fairness or correctness of the conviction for theft. In accordance with section 304A of the Criminal Procedure Act, the conviction and all proceedings up to and including 4 August 1999 were set aside to protect the rights of the accused and the integrity of the judicial process.

Citation
[2004] ZAFSHC 58
Parties
Applicant: The State; Respondent: Edwin Moletsane
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 June 2004
Case Number
R79/2004
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Special Review
Outcome
Conviction and all proceedings up to and including 4 August 1999 set aside.
Judges
Wright, R, Lombard, D.J.
Legal Topics
Theft, Review Proceedings, Criminal Procedure Act Section 304a

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Edwin Moletsane

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Special Review

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for theft should stand in light of the inability to reconstruct the record.
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings up to 4 August 1999 should be set aside due to procedural irregularities.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, due to the impossibility of reconstructing the record of proceedings, it was not possible to confirm the fairness or correctness of the conviction for theft. In accordance with section 304A of the Criminal Procedure Act, the conviction and all proceedings up to and including 4 August 1999 were set aside to protect the rights of the accused and the integrity of the judicial process.

Court Disposition

Conviction and all proceedings up to and including 4 August 1999 set aside.

Orders

  • The conviction is set aside.
  • All proceedings up to and including 4 August 1999 are set aside.