S v Morokoane (483/91) [1992] ZASCA 171 (25 September 1992)

S v Morokoane (483/91) [1992] ZASCA 171 (25 September 1992)

The court found that, even excluding the disputed pointing-out evidence of 31 August, the remaining admissible evidence, including the ballistic analysis and the circumstances of the revolver's recovery, proved Morokoane's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The trial court's credibility findings were upheld, with the appellant's version rejected as improbable and inconsistent. The murders were executed in a cold, calculated manner with the direct intention to eliminate witnesses. No mitigating factors were present, and aggravating factors were overwhelming, including the execution-style killings and the trauma inflicted on the victims. The death sentence was deemed the only appropriate...

Citation
[1992] ZASCA 171
Parties
Appellant: S I Morokoane; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
25 September 1992
Case Number
483/91
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against convictions and sentences dismissed. Death sentences confirmed.
Judges
E M Grosskopf, F H Grosskopf, Nicholas
Legal Topics
Murder, Admissibility of Evidence, Death Sentence, Pointing Outs, Voluntariness of Confession
Criminal Law Murder Admissibility of Evidence Death Sentence Pointing Outs Voluntariness of Confession

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S I Morokoane

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's convictions for murder were supported by admissible evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
  2. 2 Whether the pointing-out evidence and statement to the magistrate were admissible and voluntary.
  3. 3 Whether the death sentence was the appropriate punishment given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, even excluding the disputed pointing-out evidence of 31 August, the remaining admissible evidence, including the ballistic analysis and the circumstances of the revolver's recovery, proved Morokoane's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The trial court's credibility findings were upheld, with the appellant's version rejected as improbable and inconsistent. The murders were executed in a cold, calculated manner with the direct intention to eliminate witnesses. No mitigating factors were present, and aggravating factors were overwhelming, including the execution-style killings and the trauma inflicted on the victims. The death sentence was deemed the only appropriate...

Court Disposition

Appeal against convictions and sentences dismissed. Death sentences confirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal against the convictions and sentences is dismissed.
  • The sentences of death are confirmed.