S v Mpompi (10/2013) [2013] ZAFSHC 202 (14 November 2013)
The court found that the confirmation of the admission of guilt fine was irregular because it was made after the accused had already pleaded to the charge. Section 57A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act clearly prohibits the fixing of an admission of guilt fine after a plea has been entered. The magistrate who confirmed the fine was unaware of the prior plea, resulting in a procedural error. The High Court, as the reviewing authority, set aside the confirmation of the admission of guilt fine to correct the irregularity.
- Citation
- [2013] ZAFSHC 202
- Parties
- Applicant: The State; Respondent: Ndabathathwa William Mpompi
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2013
- Case Number
- 10/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Special Review After Admission of Guilt Confirmed
- Outcome
- The confirmation of the admission of guilt fine is set aside.
- Judges
- Van Zyl, Reinders
- Legal Topics
- Admission of Guilt, Criminal Procedure Act, Review of Magistrate Decision, Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Applicant
Ndabathathwa William Mpompi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Special Review After Admission of Guilt Confirmed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the confirmation of the admission of guilt fine was lawful after the accused had already pleaded on the same offence.
- 2 Whether the magistrate's confirmation of the admission of guilt fine contravened section 57A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the confirmation of the admission of guilt fine was irregular because it was made after the accused had already pleaded to the charge. Section 57A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act clearly prohibits the fixing of an admission of guilt fine after a plea has been entered. The magistrate who confirmed the fine was unaware of the prior plea, resulting in a procedural error. The High Court, as the reviewing authority, set aside the confirmation of the admission of guilt fine to correct the irregularity.
Court Disposition
The confirmation of the admission of guilt fine is set aside.
Orders
- The confirmation of the admission of guilt on 4 October 2013 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment