S v Msizi and Another (637/92) [1993] ZASCA 155 (29 September 1993)

S v Msizi and Another (637/92) [1993] ZASCA 155 (29 September 1993)

The court found that the murders were committed with extreme brutality and premeditation, targeting police officers and an innocent bystander. The appellants' own statements revealed a desire for weapon training and criminal activity, rather than any genuine political motive. The aggravating circumstances, including the nature of the victims, the calculated search for police, and the appellants' evident enjoyment of their actions, overwhelmingly outweighed any mitigating factors such as youthfulness or lack of prior convictions. The court held that the death penalty was the only appropriate sentence for both appellants, as the interests of justice, deterrence, and community outrage...

Citation
[1993] ZASCA 155
Parties
Appellant: Kwanele Msizi; Appellant: Phakamile Cishe; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 September 1993
Case Number
637/92
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
The appeal is dismissed.
Judges
Hefer, Eksteen, Krieger
Legal Topics
Murder, Attempted Murder, Theft, Sentencing, Aggravating Circumstances, Political Motive
Criminal Law Murder Attempted Murder Theft Sentencing Aggravating Circumstances Political Motive

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kwanele Msizi

Appellant

Phakamile Cishe

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the death sentence imposed for murder was appropriate given the aggravating and mitigating circumstances.
  2. 2 Whether the appellants' political motive could be considered a mitigating factor.
  3. 3 Whether youthfulness and lack of previous convictions should mitigate sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the murders were committed with extreme brutality and premeditation, targeting police officers and an innocent bystander. The appellants' own statements revealed a desire for weapon training and criminal activity, rather than any genuine political motive. The aggravating circumstances, including the nature of the victims, the calculated search for police, and the appellants' evident enjoyment of their actions, overwhelmingly outweighed any mitigating factors such as youthfulness or lack of prior convictions. The court held that the death penalty was the only appropriate sentence for both appellants, as the interests of justice, deterrence, and community outrage...

Court Disposition

The appeal is dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal against the death sentences imposed for murder is dismissed.
  • The sentences imposed by the trial court are confirmed.