S v Ngcobo (529/93, 21/95) [1995] ZASCA 22 (27 March 1995)

S v Ngcobo (529/93, 21/95) [1995] ZASCA 22 (27 March 1995)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the trial court was justified in accepting Shange's identification of the appellant as one of the shooters, given his credibility, the corroboration by the appellant's own admissions, and the rejection of the appellant's and Shazi's evidence as false beyond reasonable doubt. The application to remit for further evidence was refused because Jabu Maphumulo's testimony was not shown to be likely true in the context of this case, especially considering her motive and the additional corroborative facts against the appellant. The appeal against the convictions on counts 23, 24, and 25 was dismissed. Regarding the death sentences, the court found...

Citation
[1995] ZASCA 22
Parties
Appellant: Goodman Msawakhe Ngcobo; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
27 March 1995
Case Number
529/93, 21/95
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Convictions and Death Sentences; Application to Remit for Further Evidence
Outcome
Appeal against convictions on counts 23, 24, and 25 dismissed; consideration of death sentences postponed pending Constitutional Court judgment.
Judges
Hefer, Eksteen, Van den Heever
Legal Topics
Murder, Attempted Murder, Admissibility of Further Evidence, Identification Evidence, Death Sentence, Onus of Proof
Criminal Law Murder Attempted Murder Admissibility of Further Evidence Identification Evidence Death Sentence Onus of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Goodman Msawakhe Ngcobo

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Convictions and Death Sentences; Application to Remit for Further Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's convictions on counts 23, 24, and 25 were justified on the evidence presented.
  2. 2 Whether the application to remit the matter for further evidence (testimony of Jabu Maphumulo) should be granted.
  3. 3 Whether the death sentences imposed on nine counts of murder were appropriate given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the trial court was justified in accepting Shange's identification of the appellant as one of the shooters, given his credibility, the corroboration by the appellant's own admissions, and the rejection of the appellant's and Shazi's evidence as false beyond reasonable doubt. The application to remit for further evidence was refused because Jabu Maphumulo's testimony was not shown to be likely true in the context of this case, especially considering her motive and the additional corroborative facts against the appellant. The appeal against the convictions on counts 23, 24, and 25 was dismissed. Regarding the death sentences, the court found...

Court Disposition

Appeal against convictions on counts 23, 24, and 25 dismissed; consideration of death sentences postponed pending Constitutional Court judgment.

Orders

  • The appeal against the convictions on counts 23, 24, and 25 is dismissed.
  • The appeal against the death sentences imposed on counts 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 23, and 24 is postponed to a date to be arranged after the Constitutional Court has given its judgment on the constitutionality of the death sentence.