S v Ntsime (48/04) [2005] ZANWHC 30 (14 April 2005)

S v Ntsime (48/04) [2005] ZANWHC 30 (14 April 2005)

The appeal court found that the trial court correctly dismissed the appellant's version as palpably fabricated and not reasonably possibly true. The evidence established that the appellant, after a confrontation triggered by his motor vehicle being bumped, intentionally pointed a firearm at the complainant and fired shots at close range, constituting attempted murder. The fact that the shots missed was immaterial, as the appellant foresaw the risk to life and acted with the requisite intent. However, the appeal court held that the trial court misdirected itself in sentencing by failing to adequately consider mitigating factors, including the role of alcohol, provocation, absence of...

Citation
[2005] ZANWHC 30
Parties
Appellant: Sello Abia Ntsime; Respondent: The State
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 April 2005
Case Number
48/04
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence upheld.
Judges
R D Mokgoatlheng, M T R Mogoeng
Legal Topics
Attempted Murder, Sentencing Principles, Intention, Firearm Offences
Criminal Law Attempted Murder Sentencing Principles Intention Firearm Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sello Abia Ntsime

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the State proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant committed attempted murder.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred in accepting the credibility and reliability of the State's witnesses.
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was disturbingly inappropriate and justified intervention on appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal court found that the trial court correctly dismissed the appellant's version as palpably fabricated and not reasonably possibly true. The evidence established that the appellant, after a confrontation triggered by his motor vehicle being bumped, intentionally pointed a firearm at the complainant and fired shots at close range, constituting attempted murder. The fact that the shots missed was immaterial, as the appellant foresaw the risk to life and acted with the requisite intent. However, the appeal court held that the trial court misdirected itself in sentencing by failing to adequately consider mitigating factors, including the role of alcohol, provocation, absence of...

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal in respect of conviction is dismissed.
  • The appeal against sentence is upheld.