S v Olivier (172/91) [1993] ZASCA 13 (4 March 1993)

S v Olivier (172/91) [1993] ZASCA 13 (4 March 1993)

The court found that the appellant's own assault on the deceased, while serious, was not life-threatening and did not cause the death. There was no evidence of a prior agreement or common purpose to commit a fatal assault, nor did the appellant foresee or associate himself with the subsequent fatal assault by his co-accused. The requirements for liability under common purpose, as set out in S v Mgedezi, were not met. The appellant's conviction for culpable homicide was therefore not justified. However, on his own admissions, the appellant was guilty of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm. The conviction for culpable homicide was set aside and substituted with a conviction for...

Citation
[1993] ZASCA 13
Parties
Appellant: Johannes Marthinus Olivier; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
4 March 1993
Case Number
172/91
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal upheld; conviction for culpable homicide set aside and substituted with conviction for assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
Judges
Smalberger, Milne, F H Grosskopf
Legal Topics
Common Purpose, Culpable Homicide, Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm, Police Misconduct
Criminal Law Common Purpose Culpable Homicide Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm Police Misconduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Johannes Marthinus Olivier

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was correctly convicted of culpable homicide on the basis of common purpose.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's conduct was causally linked to the death of the deceased.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant foresaw or associated himself with the fatal assault by his co-accused.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant's own assault on the deceased, while serious, was not life-threatening and did not cause the death. There was no evidence of a prior agreement or common purpose to commit a fatal assault, nor did the appellant foresee or associate himself with the subsequent fatal assault by his co-accused. The requirements for liability under common purpose, as set out in S v Mgedezi, were not met. The appellant's conviction for culpable homicide was therefore not justified. However, on his own admissions, the appellant was guilty of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm. The conviction for culpable homicide was set aside and substituted with a conviction for...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; conviction for culpable homicide set aside and substituted with conviction for assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.

Orders

  • The conviction and sentence for culpable homicide are set aside.
  • The appellant is convicted of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.