S v Pillay (129/95) [1995] ZASCA 135 (22 November 1995)

S v Pillay (129/95) [1995] ZASCA 135 (22 November 1995)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found no grounds to interfere with the judgment of the court a quo, which had altered the conviction from rape to attempted rape and reduced the sentence accordingly. The evidence and reasoning of the lower courts were considered and found to be sound. The appeal against the conviction for attempted rape was dismissed.

Citation
[1995] ZASCA 135
Parties
Appellant: Pragasen Pillay; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 November 1995
Case Number
129/95
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Judges
Hefer, Steyn, Van Coller
Legal Topics
Rape, Attempted Rape, Appellate Review, Conviction Reduction
Criminal Law Rape Attempted Rape Appellate Review Conviction Reduction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pragasen Pillay

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for rape should be upheld or altered to attempted rape.
  2. 2 Whether the appellate court was correct in reducing the sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal found no grounds to interfere with the judgment of the court a quo, which had altered the conviction from rape to attempted rape and reduced the sentence accordingly. The evidence and reasoning of the lower courts were considered and found to be sound. The appeal against the conviction for attempted rape was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.