S v Rakanang (84/2007) [2007] ZANWHC 68 (1 November 2007)

S v Rakanang (84/2007) [2007] ZANWHC 68 (1 November 2007)

The court found that the record for counts 2 and 3 was missing and could not be reconstructed from the notes of the presiding officer or the prosecutor, nor from the audio cassettes. In the absence of a complete record, the convictions and sentences for counts 2 and 3 could not be confirmed and were set aside. The conviction and sentence for count 1, for which the record was complete, was confirmed.

Citation
[2007] ZANWHC 68
Parties
Applicant: The State; Respondent: Kuli Rakanang
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
1 November 2007
Case Number
84/2007
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Review Judgment
Outcome
Conviction and sentence in count 1 confirmed; conviction and sentence in counts 2 and 3 set aside.
Judges
R H MotSomane, A A Landman
Legal Topics
Record Reconstruction, Setting Aside Conviction, Confirmation of Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Kuli Rakanang

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Review Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the record of proceedings could be reconstructed for counts 2 and 3.
  2. 2 Whether convictions and sentences for counts 2 and 3 should stand in the absence of evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the record for counts 2 and 3 was missing and could not be reconstructed from the notes of the presiding officer or the prosecutor, nor from the audio cassettes. In the absence of a complete record, the convictions and sentences for counts 2 and 3 could not be confirmed and were set aside. The conviction and sentence for count 1, for which the record was complete, was confirmed.

Court Disposition

Conviction and sentence in count 1 confirmed; conviction and sentence in counts 2 and 3 set aside.

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence in count 1 is confirmed.
  • Conviction and sentence in respect of counts 2 and 3 is set aside.