S v Rikhotso (SS105/11) [2012] ZAGPJHC 106 (15 May 2012)
The court held that section 5 of the Sexual Offences and Related Matters Act does create a punishable offence, as the Act contemplates sentencing upon conviction for any offence under its provisions. The absence of a specific penalty clause does not negate the existence of an offence, as the concept of 'sentence' inherently includes punishment, which is regulated by the Criminal Procedure Act. The court rejected the reasoning in the Prins judgment, finding it erroneous for failing to consider section 56(7) of the Act. Furthermore, even if section 5 did not create a new offence, the common law offence of indecent assault would not be repealed, and the accused could still be convicted on...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAGPJHC 106
- Parties
- Applicant: THE STATE; Defendant: Jazzman Rikhotso
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2012
- Case Number
- SS105/11
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Conviction and Acquittal
- Outcome
- The accused is acquitted on counts 10, 12, 28, 30, 36, 38 and 49, and convicted on all remaining counts.
- Judges
- C.G. Lamont
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences and Related Matters Act, Rape, Indecent Assault, Charge Sheet Defects, Competent Verdicts, Criminal Procedure Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE STATE
Applicant
Jazzman Rikhotso
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Conviction and Acquittal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 5 of the Sexual Offences and Related Matters Act creates a punishable offence.
- 2 Whether the accused can be convicted for sexual violation under section 5 or only for rape under section 3.
- 3 Whether the repeal of common law offences by section 68 of the Act is effective if no new offence is created.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 5 of the Sexual Offences and Related Matters Act does create a punishable offence, as the Act contemplates sentencing upon conviction for any offence under its provisions. The absence of a specific penalty clause does not negate the existence of an offence, as the concept of 'sentence' inherently includes punishment, which is regulated by the Criminal Procedure Act. The court rejected the reasoning in the Prins judgment, finding it erroneous for failing to consider section 56(7) of the Act. Furthermore, even if section 5 did not create a new offence, the common law offence of indecent assault would not be repealed, and the accused could still be convicted on...
Court Disposition
The accused is acquitted on counts 10, 12, 28, 30, 36, 38 and 49, and convicted on all remaining counts.
Orders
- The accused is acquitted on counts 10, 12, 28, 30, 36, 38 and 49.
- The accused is convicted on counts 1 to 9, 11, 13 to 27, 29, 31 to 35, 37, 39 to 48, 50 to 58.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment