S v S (9889/2012) [2015] ZAGPJHC 301 (18 December 2015)

S v S (9889/2012) [2015] ZAGPJHC 301 (18 December 2015)

The court found that the applicant's resignation from his lucrative employment was voluntary and not compelled by circumstances beyond his control. He failed to demonstrate how he would continue to meet his substantial monthly obligations after resigning, and the evidence suggested he remained financially capable, including involvement in profitable companies and continued high expenses. The applicant did not adequately disclose his financial position or respond to the respondent's counter-application. The respondent's own employment status did not materially affect the maintenance order, and her expenses had not decreased as alleged. Accordingly, the applicant failed to establish a...

Citation
[2015] ZAGPJHC 301
Parties
Applicant: [S........] [F........] [P......]; Respondent: [S.........] [R........] [P........] (formerly [B......] [E.......])
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
18 December 2015
Case Number
9889/2012
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Variation of Rule 43 Maintenance Order Under Rule 43(6)
Outcome
Application for reduction of maintenance dismissed; respondent's counter-application dismissed; costs to be costs in the cause; restrictions in Rules 43(7) and (8) waived.
Judges
Weiner
Legal Topics
Maintenance Variation, Rule 43 Procedure, Material Change in Circumstances
Family and Children Civil Procedure Maintenance Variation Rule 43 Procedure Material Change in Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

[S........] [F........] [P......]

Applicant

[S.........] [R........] [P........] (formerly [B......] [E.......])

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application for Variation of Rule 43 Maintenance Order Under Rule 43(6)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's resignation from employment constitutes a material change in circumstances justifying a reduction of maintenance under Rule 43(6).
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's alleged change in employment status and income affects the maintenance obligations.
  3. 3 Whether the expenses related to the children and household have materially changed since the original order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's resignation from his lucrative employment was voluntary and not compelled by circumstances beyond his control. He failed to demonstrate how he would continue to meet his substantial monthly obligations after resigning, and the evidence suggested he remained financially capable, including involvement in profitable companies and continued high expenses. The applicant did not adequately disclose his financial position or respond to the respondent's counter-application. The respondent's own employment status did not materially affect the maintenance order, and her expenses had not decreased as alleged. Accordingly, the applicant failed to establish a...

Court Disposition

Application for reduction of maintenance dismissed; respondent's counter-application dismissed; costs to be costs in the cause; restrictions in Rules 43(7) and (8) waived.

Orders

  • The applicant's application in terms of Rule 43(6) is dismissed.
  • The respondent's counter-application is dismissed.