S v Selestin (SS08/2007) [2008] ZAWCHC 83 (27 October 2008)

S v Selestin (SS08/2007) [2008] ZAWCHC 83 (27 October 2008)

The Court found that the accused's fingerprints were present on a plate in the deceased's house and inside the deceased's motor vehicle, and that property belonging to the deceased was found in the accused's possession. The accused's explanation involving a third party, Ebrahim Gumba, was unsupported and contradicted by the timeline and evidence. The hammer found at the accused's residence contained the deceased's blood, and the accused's possession of the stolen vehicle and other items was not credibly explained. The circumstantial evidence, corroborated by forensic findings and witness testimony, was consistent with the accused's guilt and excluded any reasonable alternative inference....

Citation
[2008] ZAWCHC 83
Parties
Applicant: The State; Defendant: Bernard Mussa Selestin
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
27 October 2008
Case Number
SS08/2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Verdict
Outcome
The accused is found guilty on all three counts as charged: murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, and attempted murder.
Judges
Ngewu
Legal Topics
Murder, Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances, Attempted Murder, Circumstantial Evidence, Fingerprint Evidence, Criminal Law Amendment Act
Criminal Law Murder Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances Attempted Murder Circumstantial Evidence Fingerprint Evidence Criminal Law Amendment Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Bernard Mussa Selestin

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Trial / Verdict

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed Bertus Schreuder.
  2. 2 Whether the accused committed robbery with aggravating circumstances by taking the deceased's property.
  3. 3 Whether the accused attempted to murder Ulrich Reinhard Milongi.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the accused's fingerprints were present on a plate in the deceased's house and inside the deceased's motor vehicle, and that property belonging to the deceased was found in the accused's possession. The accused's explanation involving a third party, Ebrahim Gumba, was unsupported and contradicted by the timeline and evidence. The hammer found at the accused's residence contained the deceased's blood, and the accused's possession of the stolen vehicle and other items was not credibly explained. The circumstantial evidence, corroborated by forensic findings and witness testimony, was consistent with the accused's guilt and excluded any reasonable alternative inference....

Court Disposition

The accused is found guilty on all three counts as charged: murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, and attempted murder.

Orders

  • The accused is convicted on count 1: murder.
  • The accused is convicted on count 2: robbery with aggravating circumstances.