S v Smith (2007/0263) [2008] ZAGPHC 473 (12 December 2008)
The court found that the evidence did not establish the crime of attempted murder against Ms Mbonani but proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted her with intent to do grievous bodily harm. Regarding the murder charge, the court held that the State's eyewitnesses were unreliable and that the accused's version of acting in private defence was reasonably possibly true. The contradictions in witness statements were material and negatively affected their credibility. The accused's fear of grievous bodily harm was reasonable, and the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused exceeded the bounds of private defence. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted...
- Citation
- [2008] ZAGPHC 473
- Parties
- Applicant: The State; Defendant: Tebogo Thomas Smith
- Court
- High Courts - Gauteng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2008
- Case Number
- 2007/0263
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- The accused is acquitted of attempted murder and murder. He is convicted of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
- Judges
- Meyer
- Legal Topics
- Private Defence, Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm, Attempted Murder, Murder, Credibility of Witnesses, Contradictory Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Applicant
Tebogo Thomas Smith
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is guilty of attempted murder of Ms Phindile Mbonani.
- 2 Whether the accused is guilty of murder of Mr Wiseman Ntand Makhanya.
- 3 Whether the accused acted in private defence when shooting the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence did not establish the crime of attempted murder against Ms Mbonani but proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted her with intent to do grievous bodily harm. Regarding the murder charge, the court held that the State's eyewitnesses were unreliable and that the accused's version of acting in private defence was reasonably possibly true. The contradictions in witness statements were material and negatively affected their credibility. The accused's fear of grievous bodily harm was reasonable, and the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused exceeded the bounds of private defence. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted...
Court Disposition
The accused is acquitted of attempted murder and murder. He is convicted of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
Orders
- The accused is found not guilty of attempted murder (count 1), but guilty of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
- The accused is found not guilty of murder (count 2).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment