S v Speedy (444/83) [1985] ZASCA 1; [1985] 2 All SA 112 (A) (12 March 1985)

S v Speedy (444/83) [1985] ZASCA 1; [1985] 2 All SA 112 (A) (12 March 1985)

The court found that the appellant genuinely believed his conduct was lawful, based on a longstanding dispute with his neighbour and a purported understanding regarding the consequences of repeated trespass. The appellant's actions were open and transparent, and he attempted to communicate with Scholtz before slaughtering the goats. The magistrate did not make any adverse credibility findings against the appellant, and the evidence supported the existence of a reasonable possibility that the appellant believed he was entitled to act as he did. The State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was aware of the unlawfulness of his conduct. Accordingly, the conviction and...

Citation
[1985] ZASCA 1
Parties
Appellant: Gilbert Speedy; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 March 1985
Case Number
444/83
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal upheld; conviction and sentence set aside.
Judges
Kotzé, Joubert, Botha, Hefer, Eloff
Legal Topics
Animus Furandi, Absence of Unlawfulness, Belief in Lawfulness, Theft, Mens Rea
Criminal Law Animus Furandi Absence of Unlawfulness Belief in Lawfulness Theft Mens Rea

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gilbert Speedy

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant possessed the necessary intention to commit theft (animus furandi).
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was aware of the unlawfulness of his conduct when slaughtering the goats.
  3. 3 Whether a reasonable possibility existed that the appellant believed his actions were lawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant genuinely believed his conduct was lawful, based on a longstanding dispute with his neighbour and a purported understanding regarding the consequences of repeated trespass. The appellant's actions were open and transparent, and he attempted to communicate with Scholtz before slaughtering the goats. The magistrate did not make any adverse credibility findings against the appellant, and the evidence supported the existence of a reasonable possibility that the appellant believed he was entitled to act as he did. The State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was aware of the unlawfulness of his conduct. Accordingly, the conviction and...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; conviction and sentence set aside.

Orders

  • The appeal succeeds.
  • The conviction and sentence are set aside.