S v Stimele (20160108, 264/2016) [2016] ZAECGHC 94 (27 September 2016)
The magistrate imposed a sentence of 18 months imprisonment suspended for 3 years in open court. The record erroneously reflected 18 years imprisonment due to a transcription error. As the accused was sentenced correctly in open court and suffered no prejudice, the court ordered that the record be amended to reflect the correct sentence.
- Citation
- [2016] ZAECGHC 94
- Parties
- Applicant: The State; Respondent: Sizwe Stimele
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2016
- Case Number
- 20160108, 264/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Special Review
- Outcome
- The recorded sentence is set aside and substituted with the correct sentence of 18 months imprisonment suspended for 3 years.
- Judges
- J.D. Pickering, J.M. Roberson
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Error, Suspended Sentence, Section 4 Act 140 of 1992
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Applicant
Sizwe Stimele
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Special Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence as recorded was correct and reflected the sentence imposed in open court.
- 2 Whether the error in transcription of the sentence should be rectified.
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate imposed a sentence of 18 months imprisonment suspended for 3 years in open court. The record erroneously reflected 18 years imprisonment due to a transcription error. As the accused was sentenced correctly in open court and suffered no prejudice, the court ordered that the record be amended to reflect the correct sentence.
Court Disposition
The recorded sentence is set aside and substituted with the correct sentence of 18 months imprisonment suspended for 3 years.
Orders
- The sentence recorded on annexure B to the charge sheet is set aside and substituted by the following sentence: 18 months imprisonment the whole of which is suspended for 3 years on condition that the accused is not convicted of contravening section 4 or 5 of Act 140 of 1992 committed during the period of suspension.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment