S v Thunzi and Another (CCT 81/09) [2010] ZACC 27 (2 December 2010)
The Constitutional Court found that, while parallel legislation regulating dangerous weapons exists in the former homelands, none of the offending provisions are currently operational due to the withdrawal of activating notices. Parliament and the Minister have undertaken to introduce uniform legislation in the 2011 session. Given this undertaking and the inoperative status of the statutes, it is not in the interests of justice to declare the legislation unconstitutional or to grant immediate relief. Instead, the matter is postponed to allow Parliament and the Minister to report on steps taken to fulfill their undertaking. The Court formally notes the executive and legislative commitment...
- Citation
- [2010] ZACC 27
- Parties
- Applicant: The State; Respondent: Kholekile Witness Thunzi; Respondent: Siyabulela Mlonzi; Respondent: Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development; Respondent: Speaker of the National Assembly; Respondent: Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2010
- Case Number
- CCT 81/09
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Confirmation / Post Referral for Confirmation of High Court Order
- Outcome
- Matter postponed pending Parliament and Minister's report on legislative steps to rationalise the laws.
- Judges
- Froneman, Ngcobo, Moseneke, Brand, Cameron, Jafta, Khampepe, Mogoeng, Nkabinde, Skweyiya, Yacoob
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Discrimination, Transitional Legislation, Dangerous Weapons Act, Parliamentary Obligation, Rationalisation of Laws
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Applicant
Kholekile Witness Thunzi
Respondent
Siyabulela Mlonzi
Respondent
Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development
Respondent
Speaker of the National Assembly
Respondent
Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Confirmation / Post Referral for Confirmation of High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Does item 2 of Schedule 6 to the Constitution impose a constitutional obligation on Parliament to rationalise laws governing dangerous weapons in the former homelands?
- 2 Is Parliament in breach of this obligation by failing to establish uniform legislation?
- 3 Is the continued operation of the Dangerous Weapons Acts in Transkei, Bophuthatswana, Venda and Ciskei unconstitutional?
Ratio Decidendi
The Constitutional Court found that, while parallel legislation regulating dangerous weapons exists in the former homelands, none of the offending provisions are currently operational due to the withdrawal of activating notices. Parliament and the Minister have undertaken to introduce uniform legislation in the 2011 session. Given this undertaking and the inoperative status of the statutes, it is not in the interests of justice to declare the legislation unconstitutional or to grant immediate relief. Instead, the matter is postponed to allow Parliament and the Minister to report on steps taken to fulfill their undertaking. The Court formally notes the executive and legislative commitment...
Court Disposition
Matter postponed pending Parliament and Minister's report on legislative steps to rationalise the laws.
Orders
- The matter is postponed to Tuesday, 29 November 2011.
- The Speaker of the National Assembly, the Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces and the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development are required to notify this Court by Tuesday, 8 November 2011 of the legislative steps taken to fulfill the undertaking to rationalise the laws that are the subject...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment