S v Windvogel and Others (689/87) [1988] ZASCA 85 (1 September 1988)

S v Windvogel and Others (689/87) [1988] ZASCA 85 (1 September 1988)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court was justified in rejecting the appellants' claims of compulsion and intoxication as untruthful and exaggerated. The evidence showed that the appellants used significant violence, stabbing the deceased multiple times in vital areas, and that the murder was committed in the course of a robbery. The argument that the murder was not premeditated and only involved indirect intent was dismissed, as the use of violence was foreseeable and accepted by the appellants. The court further found that the youthfulness of the appellants did not reduce their culpability, given the brutality and motive of the crime. Accordingly, the appeal against the...

Citation
[1988] ZASCA 85
Parties
Appellant: Freek Windvogel; Appellant: Flippie Botha; Appellant: Mthethezi Gladman Dayimani; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
1 September 1988
Case Number
689/87
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
The appeal is dismissed.
Judges
Hefer, Steyn, Viljoen
Legal Topics
Murder, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Intention, Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
Criminal Law Murder Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Intention Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Freek Windvogel

Appellant

Flippie Botha

Appellant

Mthethezi Gladman Dayimani

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial court correctly found that there were no mitigating circumstances in the murder conviction.
  2. 2 Whether the appellants acted under compulsion or were significantly influenced by alcohol or drugs.
  3. 3 Whether the murder was premeditated or committed with indirect intent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court was justified in rejecting the appellants' claims of compulsion and intoxication as untruthful and exaggerated. The evidence showed that the appellants used significant violence, stabbing the deceased multiple times in vital areas, and that the murder was committed in the course of a robbery. The argument that the murder was not premeditated and only involved indirect intent was dismissed, as the use of violence was foreseeable and accepted by the appellants. The court further found that the youthfulness of the appellants did not reduce their culpability, given the brutality and motive of the crime. Accordingly, the appeal against the...

Court Disposition

The appeal is dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal against the death sentence is dismissed.