Saaiman N.O and Another v Suidwes Landbou (Pty) Ltd (KP177/2018) [2023] ZANWHC 87 (23 June 2023)

Saaiman N.O and Another v Suidwes Landbou (Pty) Ltd (KP177/2018) [2023] ZANWHC 87 (23 June 2023)

The court found that the plaintiffs' case was based on an alleged oral agreement, which was contradicted by the written contract containing a non-variation clause and an indemnity clause. The evidence established that the only binding agreement was the written contract, which placed the obligation to maintain and pay for the life insurance policy on the Saaiman Trust, not on Suidwes Landbou. The defendant's obligation to pay premiums was conditional on the Trust's available credit, which was exhausted at the relevant time. The indemnity clause further protected Suidwes Landbou from any liability arising from non-payment of premiums or the insurer's refusal to pay. The alternative claim in...

Citation
[2023] ZANWHC 87
Parties
Plaintiff: Adriaan Jacobus Saaiman N.O.; Plaintiff: Maria Elizabeth Joubert N.O.; Defendant: Suidwes Landbou (Pty) Ltd
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 June 2023
Case Number
KP177/2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiffs' main and alternative claims dismissed with costs on an attorney client scale.
Judges
A H Petersen
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Credit Life Insurance, Indemnity Clause, Non Variation Clause, Delictual Liability
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Breach of Contract Credit Life Insurance Indemnity Clause Non Variation Clause Delictual Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adriaan Jacobus Saaiman N.O.

Plaintiff

Maria Elizabeth Joubert N.O.

Plaintiff

Suidwes Landbou (Pty) Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant breached a contract or legal duty by failing to pay the annual life insurance premium for the plaintiffs' ceded policy.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs suffered damages as a result of the alleged breach or delict.
  3. 3 Whether the written agreement between the parties excluded any oral agreement and indemnified the defendant from liability for non-payment of insurance premiums.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs' case was based on an alleged oral agreement, which was contradicted by the written contract containing a non-variation clause and an indemnity clause. The evidence established that the only binding agreement was the written contract, which placed the obligation to maintain and pay for the life insurance policy on the Saaiman Trust, not on Suidwes Landbou. The defendant's obligation to pay premiums was conditional on the Trust's available credit, which was exhausted at the relevant time. The indemnity clause further protected Suidwes Landbou from any liability arising from non-payment of premiums or the insurer's refusal to pay. The alternative claim in...

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' main and alternative claims dismissed with costs on an attorney client scale.

Orders

  • The plaintiffs’ main and alternative claims are dismissed with costs on an attorney client scale.