SACCAWU and Others v President of the Industrial Tribunal and Another (522/98) [2000] ZASCA 74; 2001 (2) SA 277 (SCA) ; [2001] 2 All SA 117 (A); (2001) 22 ILJ 1311 (SCA) (29 November 2000)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the appellants failed to establish bias on the part of the tribunal members. The allegations of bias were generalised and lacked sufficient particularity, and the respondent's denials were adequate to raise substantial disputes of fact. The only specific incident cited, Netshifhefhe's remarks to the appellants, was found to be inappropriate but not indicative of bias against the appellants. The absence of the record of proceedings prevented the court from properly adjudicating the alleged irregularities. The onus of establishing bias rests on the applicant, and in this case, it was not discharged. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2000] ZASCA 74
- Parties
- Appellant: South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union; Appellant: 173 individual employees; Respondent: President of the Industrial Tribunal of Venda; Respondent: Venda Sun Hotel and Casino Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2000
- Case Number
- 522/98
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court of Venda
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Melunsky, Hefer, Howie, Plewman, Farlam
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Labour Practice, Apprehended Bias, Review of Tribunal Decision, Onus of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union
Appellant
173 individual employees
Appellant
President of the Industrial Tribunal of Venda
Respondent
Venda Sun Hotel and Casino Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court of Venda
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the members of the Industrial Tribunal were biased against the appellants.
- 2 Whether the appellants established grounds for review of the tribunal's decision.
- 3 Whether the absence of the record of proceedings precluded proper adjudication of alleged irregularities.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the appellants failed to establish bias on the part of the tribunal members. The allegations of bias were generalised and lacked sufficient particularity, and the respondent's denials were adequate to raise substantial disputes of fact. The only specific incident cited, Netshifhefhe's remarks to the appellants, was found to be inappropriate but not indicative of bias against the appellants. The absence of the record of proceedings prevented the court from properly adjudicating the alleged irregularities. The onus of establishing bias rests on the applicant, and in this case, it was not discharged. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment