Sacoil Holdings Limited v Phembani (RF) (Pty) Ltd (LM243Mar17) [2017] ZACT 24 (17 June 2017)
- Citation
- [2017] ZACT 24
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- A Ndoni, I Valodia, F Tregenna
- Case number
- LM243Mar17
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- A Ndoni, I Valodia, F Tregenna
- Case number
- LM243Mar17
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of SacOil Holdings Limited and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd, as SacOil is engaged in oil and gas exploration and Phembani, through Afric Oil, is involved in the marketing and distribution of petroleum products. Neither party is involved in refining or processing raw natural gas. The Commission's analysis revealed no competition concerns, and the Tribunal agreed with this assessment. Furthermore, the merger does not raise any public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger without conditions.
Court disposition
Merger approved without conditions.
Orders
- The large merger between SacOil Holdings Limited and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
SacOil Holdings Limited
Applicant Counsel: Maphanga Maseko and Busisiwe MasangoPhembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Control / Approval of Large Merger
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger between SacOil Holdings Limited and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa.
- 02
Whether the merger raises any public interest concerns.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- SacOil argued that the acquisition aligns with its strategy to become a fully-integrated, pan-African industry player and offers attractive business opportunities. The transaction would also provide Afric Oil access to working capital via a shareholder with a large balance sheet, facilitating future projects.
- Respondent
- The Commission submitted that there are no horizontal overlaps between the parties, as SacOil is involved in oil and gas exploration while Phembani (through Afric Oil) is active in the marketing and distribution of petroleum products. Neither party is involved in refining or processing raw natural gas. The Commission concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raised no public interest concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Commission Report, page 12, para 25
The absence of horizontal overlap and competition concerns means a merger is unlikely to have anti-competitive effects.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of SacOil Holdings Limited and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd, as SacOil is engaged in oil and gas exploration and Phembani, through Afric Oil, is involved in the marketing and distribution of petroleum products. Neither party is involved in refining or processing raw natural gas. The Commission's analysis revealed no competition concerns, and the Tribunal agreed with this assessment. Furthermore, the merger does not raise any public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger without conditions.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the acquisition would provide Afric Oil with access to working capital, which could facilitate future projects.
- The Tribunal observed that SacOil's strategy to become a fully-integrated, pan-African industry player is consistent with the rationale for the merger.
Court disposition
Merger approved without conditions.
- The large merger between SacOil Holdings Limited and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Order
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM243Mar17
In the matter between:
SACOIL
HOLDINGS
LIMITED
Acquiring Firm
And
PHEMBANI OIL (RF) (PTY)
LTD
Target Firm
Panel
: Andiswa Ndoni (Presiding Member)
: Imraan Valodia (Tribunal Member)
: Fiona Tregenna (Tribunal Member)
Heard on
: 17 May 2017
Order Issued on : 17 May 2017
Reasons Issued on : 7 June 2017
REASONS FOR DECISION
APPROVAL
[1] On 17 May 2017, the Competition Tribunal approved the large merger between SacOil Holdings Limited (“SacOil”) and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd (“Phembani”).
[2] The reasons for the approval follow.
PARTIES
TO THE TRANSACTION AND THEIR ACTIVITIES
Primary Acquiring Firm
[3] The primary acquiring firm is SacOil, a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa.[1] SacOil’s largest shareholder is the Government Employee’s Pension Fund (“GEPF”) as represented by the Public
Investment Corporation SOC limited (“PIC”).
[4] SacOil has a diverse portfolio of assets on the African continent and focuses on investing in the exploration of oil and gas. SacOil is not involved in the refining of petroleum crude oil and the processing of raw natural gas.
Primary Target Firm
[5] The target firm is Phembani, a ring fenced special purpose vehicle controlled by Gentacure (Pty) Ltd.[2] The minority shareholder, Moopong Investment Holding Ltd (“Moopong”), holds the remaining shares. Phembani’s only interest is a 71% equity interest in Afric Oil (Pty) Ltd (“Afric Oil”).
[6] Afric Oil is involved in the marketing and distribution of petrol, diesel, illuminating paraffin, jet fuels and lubricants to a client base that comprises of local and national governments, parastatals, the mining industry, the construction industry, the transport sector, the manufacturing sector, resellers and agricultural industries. Afric Oil is only active in the marketing and distribution of such products, it does not own or operate a refinery nor does it own independent storage where it holds stock of petroleum products.
PROPOSED
TRANSACTION AND RATIONALE
[7] In terms of the proposed transaction, SacOil intends to acquire 100% of the issued share capital of Phembani Oil. On completion of the proposed transaction, SacOil will control Phembani Oil.
[8] In terms of the sale of shares agreement, SacOil will purchase 75% of the issued share capital in Phembani from Gentacure and thereafter, in terms of a share subscription and repurchase agreement entered into between SacOil and Moopong, SacOil will subscribe for the remaining 25% shareholding in Phembani.
[9] In terms of rationale, the acquiring firm submits that the acquisition is in line with its strategy to become a fully-integrated, pan-African industry player along with providing a number of attractive business opportunities.
[10] The target firm submits that the proposed transaction will assist Afric Oil to gain access to working capital through a shareholder who has a large balance sheet to raise capital for any future projects.
RELEVANT
MARKETS AND IMPACT ON COMPETITION
[11] On the Commission’s analysis, the proposed transaction presented no horizontal overlaps, with the target firm involved in the exploration of oil and gas and the primary target firm involved in the wholesale/ distribution of petroleum products.[3] The Commission submits that neither of the parties are involved in the refining of petroleum crude oil and the processing of raw natural gas.
[12] In the absence of any horizontal overlap in the merging parties’ activities and absent any other competition concerns, the Commission concluded that the proposed merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market and we find no reason to disagree with this conclusion.
CONCLUSION
[13] The merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets in South Africa.
[14] The merger additionally does not raise any public interest concerns.
[15] Accordingly we approved the transaction without conditions.
7 June 2017
Date
_______
Prof F Tregenna
Prof. I Valodia and Ms. A Ndoni concurring
Tribunal Researcher:
Alistair Dey-Van Heerden
For the Commission:
Billy Mabatamela
For the Merging Parties:
Maphanga Maseko and Busisiwe Masango of
Tshisevhe Gwina Ratshimbilani Inc.
[1] SacOil is listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange and on the Alternative Investment Market on the London Securities Exchange.
[2] Gentacure holds a 75% shareholding in Phembani.
[3] Commission Report, page12, para 25.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.