South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Sacoil Holdings Limited v Phembani (RF) (Pty) Ltd (LM243Mar17) [2017] ZACT 24 (17 June 2017)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of SacOil Holdings Limited and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd, as SacOil is engaged in oil and gas exploration and Phembani, through Afric Oil, is involved in the marketing and distribution of petroleum products. Neither party is involved in refining or processing raw natural gas. The Commission's analysis revealed no competition concerns, and the Tribunal agreed with this assessment. Furthermore, the merger does not raise any public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger without conditions.

Court disposition

Merger approved without conditions.

Orders

  • The large merger between SacOil Holdings Limited and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

SacOil Holdings Limited

Applicant Counsel: Maphanga Maseko and Busisiwe Masango

Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Approval of Large Merger

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
SacOil argued that the acquisition aligns with its strategy to become a fully-integrated, pan-African industry player and offers attractive business opportunities. The transaction would also provide Afric Oil access to working capital via a shareholder with a large balance sheet, facilitating future projects.
Respondent
The Commission submitted that there are no horizontal overlaps between the parties, as SacOil is involved in oil and gas exploration while Phembani (through Afric Oil) is active in the marketing and distribution of petroleum products. Neither party is involved in refining or processing raw natural gas. The Commission concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raised no public interest concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

  2. 02

    Commission Report, page 12, para 25

    The absence of horizontal overlap and competition concerns means a merger is unlikely to have anti-competitive effects.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of SacOil Holdings Limited and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd, as SacOil is engaged in oil and gas exploration and Phembani, through Afric Oil, is involved in the marketing and distribution of petroleum products. Neither party is involved in refining or processing raw natural gas. The Commission's analysis revealed no competition concerns, and the Tribunal agreed with this assessment. Furthermore, the merger does not raise any public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger without conditions.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the acquisition would provide Afric Oil with access to working capital, which could facilitate future projects.
  • The Tribunal observed that SacOil's strategy to become a fully-integrated, pan-African industry player is consistent with the rationale for the merger.

Court disposition

Merger approved without conditions.

  • The large merger between SacOil Holdings Limited and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2017] ZACT 24

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: LM243Mar17

In the matter between:

SACOIL

HOLDINGS

LIMITED

Acquiring Firm

And

PHEMBANI OIL (RF) (PTY)

LTD

Target Firm

Panel

: Andiswa Ndoni (Presiding Member)

: Imraan Valodia (Tribunal Member)

: Fiona Tregenna (Tribunal Member)

Heard on

: 17 May 2017

Order Issued on : 17 May 2017

Reasons Issued on : 7 June 2017

REASONS FOR DECISION

APPROVAL

[1] On 17 May 2017, the Competition Tribunal approved the large merger between SacOil Holdings Limited (“SacOil”) and Phembani Oil (RF) (Pty) Ltd (“Phembani”).

[2] The reasons for the approval follow.

PARTIES

TO THE TRANSACTION AND THEIR ACTIVITIES

Primary Acquiring Firm

[3] The primary acquiring firm is SacOil, a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa.[1] SacOil’s largest shareholder is the Government Employee’s Pension Fund (“GEPF”) as represented by the Public

Investment Corporation SOC limited (“PIC”).

[4] SacOil has a diverse portfolio of assets on the African continent and focuses on investing in the exploration of oil and gas. SacOil is not involved in the refining of petroleum crude oil and the processing of raw natural gas.

Primary Target Firm

[5] The target firm is Phembani, a ring fenced special purpose vehicle controlled by Gentacure (Pty) Ltd.[2] The minority shareholder, Moopong Investment Holding Ltd (“Moopong”), holds the remaining shares. Phembani’s only interest is a 71% equity interest in Afric Oil (Pty) Ltd (“Afric Oil”).

[6] Afric Oil is involved in the marketing and distribution of petrol, diesel, illuminating paraffin, jet fuels and lubricants to a client base that comprises of local and national governments, parastatals, the mining industry, the construction industry, the transport sector, the manufacturing sector, resellers and agricultural industries. Afric Oil is only active in the marketing and distribution of such products, it does not own or operate a refinery nor does it own independent storage where it holds stock of petroleum products.

PROPOSED

TRANSACTION AND RATIONALE

[7] In terms of the proposed transaction, SacOil intends to acquire 100% of the issued share capital of Phembani Oil. On completion of the proposed transaction, SacOil will control Phembani Oil.

[8] In terms of the sale of shares agreement, SacOil will purchase 75% of the issued share capital in Phembani from Gentacure and thereafter, in terms of a share subscription and repurchase agreement entered into between SacOil and Moopong, SacOil will subscribe for the remaining 25% shareholding in Phembani.

[9] In terms of rationale, the acquiring firm submits that the acquisition is in line with its strategy to become a fully-integrated, pan-African industry player along with providing a number of attractive business opportunities.

[10] The target firm submits that the proposed transaction will assist Afric Oil to gain access to working capital through a shareholder who has a large balance sheet to raise capital for any future projects.

RELEVANT

MARKETS AND IMPACT ON COMPETITION

[11] On the Commission’s analysis, the proposed transaction presented no horizontal overlaps, with the target firm involved in the exploration of oil and gas and the primary target firm involved in the wholesale/ distribution of petroleum products.[3] The Commission submits that neither of the parties are involved in the refining of petroleum crude oil and the processing of raw natural gas.

[12] In the absence of any horizontal overlap in the merging parties’ activities and absent any other competition concerns, the Commission concluded that the proposed merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market and we find no reason to disagree with this conclusion.

CONCLUSION

[13] The merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets in South Africa.

[14] The merger additionally does not raise any public interest concerns.

[15] Accordingly we approved the transaction without conditions.

7 June 2017

Date

_______

Prof F Tregenna

Prof. I Valodia and Ms. A Ndoni concurring

Tribunal Researcher:

Alistair Dey-Van Heerden

For the Commission:

Billy Mabatamela

For the Merging Parties:

Maphanga Maseko and Busisiwe Masango of

Tshisevhe Gwina Ratshimbilani Inc.

[1] SacOil is listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange and on the Alternative Investment Market on the London Securities Exchange.

[2] Gentacure holds a 75% shareholding in Phembani.

[3] Commission Report, page12, para 25.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.