Sadiku v Sadiku (30498/06) [2007] ZAGPHC 1 (26 January 2007)

Sadiku v Sadiku (30498/06) [2007] ZAGPHC 1 (26 January 2007)

The court found that the marriage was governed by Nigerian law, which does not recognize community of property. The defendant failed to establish that South African law should apply or that the plaintiff had acquired a South African domicile at the time of marriage. There was no evidence of an express agreement to alter the applicable law. The defendant's belief in co-ownership was not supported by law or fact, and no bona fide defence to eviction was established. The procedural requirements under PIE were met, and the eviction was granted. However, considering the defendant's genuine belief and circumstances, no costs order was made against her, and she was granted time to vacate the...

Citation
[2007] ZAGPHC 1
Parties
Plaintiff: Emmanuel Rotimi Sadiku; Defendant: Grace Jumai Sadiku; Defendant: The City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 January 2007
Case Number
30498/06
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment and Eviction
Outcome
Summary judgment for eviction granted. Each party to pay their own costs. The first defendant must vacate the property by 30 April 2007.
Judges
Van Rooyen
Legal Topics
Divorce Proprietary Consequences, Lex Domicilii, Eviction Under Pie, Community of Property, Choice of Law, Summary Judgment
Family and Children Land and Property Civil Procedure Divorce Proprietary Consequences Lex Domicilii Eviction Under Pie Community of Property Choice of Law +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emmanuel Rotimi Sadiku

Plaintiff

Grace Jumai Sadiku

Defendant

The City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment and Eviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the first defendant is entitled to remain in the property after divorce based on alleged co-ownership.
  2. 2 Whether Nigerian law or South African law governs the proprietary consequences of the marriage.
  3. 3 Whether the defendant has a bona fide defence to eviction under PIE.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the marriage was governed by Nigerian law, which does not recognize community of property. The defendant failed to establish that South African law should apply or that the plaintiff had acquired a South African domicile at the time of marriage. There was no evidence of an express agreement to alter the applicable law. The defendant's belief in co-ownership was not supported by law or fact, and no bona fide defence to eviction was established. The procedural requirements under PIE were met, and the eviction was granted. However, considering the defendant's genuine belief and circumstances, no costs order was made against her, and she was granted time to vacate the...

Court Disposition

Summary judgment for eviction granted. Each party to pay their own costs. The first defendant must vacate the property by 30 April 2007.

Orders

  • The application for summary judgment is granted.
  • Each party is to pay his or her own costs.